Best Spitfire version (1 Viewer)

Your favorite Spit version

  • Mark I and II

    Votes: 8 10.1%
  • Mark V

    Votes: 8 10.1%
  • Mark Vb

    Votes: 6 7.6%
  • Mark XII

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Mark XIII

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • Mark XIV

    Votes: 32 40.5%
  • Seafire

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Mark IX

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Mark VIII

    Votes: 11 13.9%

  • Total voters
    79
Nothing to do with performance, nothing to do with firepower simply as the thread said my favourite Spitfire Vb - three blade prop, nice tidy Merlin and no pointy fin.
 
Bit of an old thread, but it was Spitfire (with floats)!
Sorry, but once 'they' b*ggered about with folding wings for the navy boys, and especially the contra-rotating prop, it made a beautiful swan into a not that effective ugly duckling!
Oh well, guess the difference of looks is fair enough, but was the seafire really a poorer performer than those land-based spitfres of the same period? (Don't roll your eyes if this is a stupid question - I specialise in some of the Soviet planes of the time)
 
Last edited:
Spit VIII for me. Range deficiency for the general Spifire series made its choice as Best Fighter more difficult when considering total air superiority versus spendid interceptor...

I would like to have seen more VIII's engaged with early 8th AF missions in the escort role.
 
Too bad RAF USAAF did not tried a long-range fighter sweep (to just behind Ruhr?), with some 300 Spitfires VIII and 150 P-38s, with another 500 fighters (and the same number of medium bombers) flying vs. airports in Low countries France. Say, 7 days trial, 'proof of a concept', staged to end at the beginning of invasion of Sicily? Now lets toss in 200 B-17s to use up the commotion...

I take it heads would've rolled in Luftwaffe, both figuratively and litterarly.
 
Griffon, puh, nasty taste.

If it hasn't got a Merlin, it's not a Spitfire in my world!

I and II, acceleration, handling and the look of the thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back