A.G. Williams
Airman 1st Class
- 182
- Oct 10, 2020
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I have only ever seen one photo of a 40mm Class S Littlejohn round, and that showed the Mk II projectile on the right.The 2pdr/40mm 'S' gun APCNR projectiles fired with the Littlejohn adapter had tungsten-carbide cores. The type of tungsten-carbide used had a density of .48 lbs/in3, and was quite hard, but not as brittle as the usual tungsten-carbide cutting tools of the time. I do not know if both types of projectile were trialed, or only one.
View attachment 617725
My Yeomanry predecessors used the Littlejohn rounds but without the adaptor in their Daimler armoires cars. They felt the penetration was enough for anything they could penetrate and it allowed them to use the HE rounds at will.I read that the Littlejohn adaptor was hardly ever used. It prevented any other type of ammunition being used and firing the Littlejohn rounds without the adaptor at the shorter ranges armoured cars fired at meant little difference in penetration.
My Yeomanry predecessors used the Littlejohn rounds but without the adaptor in their Daimler armoires cars. They felt the penetration was enough for anything they could penetrate and it allowed them to use the HE rounds at will.
A Littlejohn round is going to act very much like like an APCR (Armor Piercing Composite Rigid) with out the muzzle adapter and a lot closer to an APDS round with the adaptor.
Little difference in AP performance until the range opens up enough for the superior ballistic shape of the squeezed down projectile to show it's advantage. The muzzle adapter my give a bit higher initial velocity.