Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind!View attachment 185267Above is a drawing from a patent lodged by Daimler Benz in 1938 showing the two-stage supercharging arrangement for the DB601C/D engine intended for the Hs 128 high altitude aircraft.
So, the idea had been thought about, pre-war.
For example, the V-1710 was rather awkward to setup with 2-stage supercharging. It ended up with a rather bulky shaft-driven 2nd stage supercharger.
The shaft extension drive was so that the auxialiary compressor could have different gearing and use a fluid coupling to vary the speed to compensate for altitude. Early 2 stage Allisons had the carb on the auxiliary supercharger, but later reverted to the carb on the engine supercharger enabling the core engine to be common with turbocharged versions. That is, they used the same engine supercharger (not necessarily gearing) and carby, but could not use intercooling or aftercooling.
Here's a bulky 2 stage setup - the R-2800-32W
http://www.enginehistory.org/P&W/R-2800-32W.jpg
That had a single speed engine supercharger, and two side mounted, variable speed (fluid coupling) auxiliary superchargers.
The two side mounted superchargers fed a pair of air to air intercoolers, which then fed the updraft carby.
Allison had developed an intercooled V-1710, the -119 (F32R). It was installed in the XP-51J. A drawing dated October 12th 1944 is featured in the page 187 of 'Vee's for victory', along with photo of engine. WEP = 1720 HP at 20700 ft (wet), MIL = 1200 HP at 30000 ft.
Okay, it's an aftercooler. So the capability to be aftercooled was there, in contrast to the opposite statement.
I was thinking that the side-mounted DB supercharger might be conducive to 2-stage supercharging.
My idea is to mount a second side-mounted supercharger - one on each side of the engine.
This leaves space for inter and/or aftercooling.
I'm wondering if this layout facilitates 2-stage supercharging better than other layouts.
For example, the V-1710 was rather awkward to setup with 2-stage supercharging. It ended up with a rather bulky shaft-driven 2nd stage supercharger.
I was thinking that the side-mounted DB supercharger might be conducive to 2-stage supercharging.
My idea is to mount a second side-mounted supercharger - one on each side of the engine.
This leaves space for inter and/or aftercooling.
I'm wondering if this layout facilitates 2-stage supercharging better than other layouts.
For example, the V-1710 was rather awkward to setup with 2-stage supercharging. It ended up with a rather bulky shaft-driven 2nd stage supercharger.