Did the RAF have designs for a long range escort fighter?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Yes. often ditchings in Channel were due to fuel starvation coming home.
 
Last edited:
drgondog said:
Less than at 10,000 feet
No that's not what I meant: What I meant was what effect did flying at 25000-31000' have on mission planning? I ask because bomber escort missions often did entail flying at those altitudes.
1000 mi straight line (P-51), 300 Combat Radius (is easier) - P47 800 mi straight line, 200 combat radius - no external tanks for both
Fascinating: I didn't know the effects varied so much, but I gotta say one thing -- the P-47 gets it rough.
About 5-7 minutes from first takeoff to Group assembled and climbing.
Okay, I understand you
Race track at 180IAS
I'm amazed they were able to stay with them all the way to Berlin...
Yes. often ditchings in Channel were due to fuel starvation coming home.
That must have been costly
 
No that's not what I meant: What I meant was what effect did flying at 25000-31000' have on mission planning? I ask because bomber escort missions often did entail flying at those altitudes.

The AAF developed Range tables for The P-38/47 and 51. Look up the P-51B/D Operating data Range Tables and parse to the bottom section for data on 'clean', w/75 gallon external. 110 gal external by altitude.
 
Just a historical reminder that during the Battle of the Bulge the battle was fought by ground forces because the whole region was fog bound for days, there was a lot of weather like that at the time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread