Jan 19, 2024 #1 Laurelix Senior Airman 370 266 Joined Jun 13, 2016 Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner
Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner
Jan 19, 2024 #2 bf109xxl Tech Sergeant 1,636 2,170 Joined Aug 9, 2023 The same source as for the M-82 graph.
Jan 19, 2024 #3 bf109xxl Tech Sergeant 1,636 2,170 Joined Aug 9, 2023 Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner View attachment 758495 Click to expand... From "Aircraft construction in the USSR" by TsAGI, 1994
Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner View attachment 758495 Click to expand... From "Aircraft construction in the USSR" by TsAGI, 1994
Jan 19, 2024 Thread starter #4 Laurelix Senior Airman 370 266 Joined Jun 13, 2016 bf109xxl said: View attachment 758498 The same source as for the M-82 graph. Click to expand... AM-38 1500hp at SL at military power 1600hp at SL at take off power Better higher alt performance AM-38F 1500hp at SL at military power 1700hp at SL at take off power Worse high alt performance What's been throwing me off is the fact Mig-3 here is listed with AM-38 engine whilst showing 1665hp But it can't be the M-38F because the mig reaches max speed at 3400m Then again… It is specific regards to M-71 and M-71F which would mean it's just the normal AM-38 Last edited: Jan 19, 2024
bf109xxl said: View attachment 758498 The same source as for the M-82 graph. Click to expand... AM-38 1500hp at SL at military power 1600hp at SL at take off power Better higher alt performance AM-38F 1500hp at SL at military power 1700hp at SL at take off power Worse high alt performance What's been throwing me off is the fact Mig-3 here is listed with AM-38 engine whilst showing 1665hp But it can't be the M-38F because the mig reaches max speed at 3400m Then again… It is specific regards to M-71 and M-71F which would mean it's just the normal AM-38
Jan 20, 2024 #5 bf109xxl Tech Sergeant 1,636 2,170 Joined Aug 9, 2023 From "Mikoyan's Piston-Engined Fighters" (Red Stars Series Vol.10) by Ye.Gordon and K.Dexter, Midland Publishing, 2003, p.56.
From "Mikoyan's Piston-Engined Fighters" (Red Stars Series Vol.10) by Ye.Gordon and K.Dexter, Midland Publishing, 2003, p.56.
Jan 20, 2024 #6 bf109xxl Tech Sergeant 1,636 2,170 Joined Aug 9, 2023 Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner Click to expand... The performance difference between M-38 and M-38F was minimal - only by TO power: From "Russian Piston Aero Engines" by V.Kotelnikov, The Crowood Press, 2005
Laurelix said: Been looking everywhere and can't seem to find anything. What also doesn't help is how AM-38F also ends up being called AM-38 in a vague manner Click to expand... The performance difference between M-38 and M-38F was minimal - only by TO power: From "Russian Piston Aero Engines" by V.Kotelnikov, The Crowood Press, 2005
Jan 20, 2024 #7 Baball Airman 1st Class 177 593 Joined Dec 26, 2018 Location France You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F.
You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F.
Jan 20, 2024 Thread starter #8 Laurelix Senior Airman 370 266 Joined Jun 13, 2016 I think Baball said: You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F. View attachment 758813 View attachment 758814 Click to expand... Thank you
I think Baball said: You can find the power curves for both versions at p.8 and p.178. in the original manual for the AM-38 and AM-38F. View attachment 758813 View attachment 758814 Click to expand... Thank you