Empty weight of drop tanks

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

33k in the air

Staff Sergeant
1,341
1,840
Jan 31, 2021
Does anyone have any data on the empty weight of drop tanks used during WWII? I'm particularly interested in knowing how the empty weight of the 108 gallon 'paper' drop tank used in the ETO compared to the empty weight of the 108 gallon metal drop tank and the later 110 gallon teardrop-shaped tank. But information on any other drop tanks would be welcomed also.

The technical aspects of drop tanks in general, other than their capacity, seems little covered either in print or online, at least, based on my search attempts.
 
This is what I have:

Hurricane
45 Impgal____77 lbs, metal (SSFT), cylindrical, fixed, combatable (includes fairing)
45 Impgal____52 lbs, paper, cylindrical, (includies fairing)
90 Impgal____98 lbs, metal, cylindrical, fixed (normally), ferry (includes fairing)
90 Impgal____70 lbs, paper, cylindrical, (includes fairing)

Spitfire
30 Impgal____75 lbs, steel, slipper, combatable
30 Impgal____40 lbs, SEMA 4 (SSFT), slipper, combatable
90 Impgal___142 lbs, steel, slipper, ferry (combatable if empty?)

Fulmar
60 Impgal___118 lbs, steel, slipper, combatable

Mosquito
42 Impgal____60 lbs, steel, slipper, combatable if empty
50 Impgal____38 lbs, wood, slipper, combatable if empty
80 Impgal____82 lbs, steel, slipper, combatable if empty

F4F Wildcat/Martlet
58 USgal____ 38 lbs, steel, teardrop (45 lbs including hanger bits)

F4U Corsair/F6F Hellcat
100 USgal__ 104 lbs, steel, streamlined
150 USgal__ 122 lbs, steel, streamlined
150 USgal__ 194 lbs, steel (SSFT), streamlined, combatable

TBF Avenger/SB2C Helldiver
100 USgal____71 lbs, steel, teardrop

P-38 Lightning
110 USgal____85 lbs, steel, teardrop
165 USgal___106 lbs, steel, streamlined
300 USgal___140 lbs, aluminum, streamlined
310 USgal___176 lbs, steel, streamlined

P-39 Airacobra
175 USgal___150 lbs, steel, conformal
175 USgal___155 lbs, steel, conformal

P-51 Mustang
75 USgal____ 50 lbs, steel, teardrop

A6M Zero
72 Impgal____72 lbs, composite, combatable

Ki-43 Oscar
44 Impgal____58 lbs, metal, teardrop
44 Impgal____53 lbs, metal, teardrop
 
Last edited:
I'll add what I've come across. The following is from Mustang: The Story of the P-51 Fighter by Robert W. Gruenhagen.

75 gal. combat tank = 60 lbs
150 gal. ferry tank = 120 lbs
165 gal. ferry tank (P-51H) = 135 lbs
110 gal. combat tank = 75 lbs

From Spitfire: A Documentary History by Alfred Price. Pages 132-133 include a weight breakdown of the Spitfire F.21 which includes the following figures for the empty weight of drop tanks:

30 gal. drop tank = 60 lbs
45 gal. blister type drop tank = 80 lbs
90 gal. blister type drop tank = 120 lbs

I'm not sure exactly what is meant by "blister type drop tank". I presume it's a reference to the torpedo-shaped type of drop tank.
 
Some more drop tank weights I've come across. The following quotes are from the Nov. 4th, 1943, issue of Flight magazine.

To provide extended fighter cover and to increase the time limit on operational sorties, the Hurricane and Typhoon fighters have fitted beneath each wing a 45-gallon metal drop tank, each approximately 7ft. long by 15in. diameter and weighing 29 lb. empty.

The Lockheed Lightning . . . continues on those lines by having two drop tanks, each fitted beneath the centre section between and nacelles. These tanks are constructed of 23 S.W.G. (0.024in.) sheet steel ; they have a capacity of 150 gallons each and weigh 90 lb. empty . . . The Lightning tanks are 10ft. long by 27in. maximum cross-sectional diameter, and are made up in two half-shell pressings, seam-welded together. Seven transverse bulkheads are welded-in, and the attachment points for connection to the aircraft are in a recessed trough on the top curvature of the tanks.
 
Lastly, drop tank weights as determined from the weight loadout tables published in America's Hundred Thousand by Francis H. Dean.

51 gallons (F4U-1) = 40 lbs
52 gallons (P-40C) = 54 lbs
58 gallons (F4F-4, FM-2) = 50 lbs
75 gallons (P-39Q-1) = 45 lbs
75 gallons (P-47D) = 50 lbs
75 gallons (A-36A-1, P-51A, P-51D) = 60 lbs
91 gallons (P-39D-2) = 45 lbs
110 gallons (P-51D) = 90 lbs
150 gallons (F4U-1D) = 79 lbs
150 gallons (A-36A-1, P-51A) = 105 lbs
150 gallons (P-63A-10) = 120 lbs
159.33 gallons (F4U-1) = 78.5 lbs
165 gallons (P-47D, P-38J) = 87.5 lbs
165 gallons (P-51D) = 115 lbs
175 gallons (F4U-1) = 95 lbs
300 gallons (P-47D) = 157 lbs
306 gallons (P-61B) = 222 lbs
312 gallons (P-38J) = 155 lbs
 
Made correction to my post#3 above. I had the weight of the 58 USgallon DT listed as 54 lbs with hanger bits, but I made a typo and reversed the 5 & 4. The weight with hanger bits should be 45 lbs.
 
Greetings to all,

First of all, thanks a million for sharing so much historical background data and comment - ww2aircraft.net is a gold mine.

I realize this particular subject is over 3 years old but it so happened I recently "bumped" on it when, searching for something completely different, Google showed a 150 gal (150.US in my own parlance) associated with a P-51 Mustang hm... not to my knowledge was my thought so I suspended whatever i was doing to check/update whichever notes I had. A specific search to supplement this update lead me to this page. If I saw it before, I didn't remember but proceeded with my data mining.
I noticed various empty weights a given volume, depending on source and material and decided to assemble the various figures shown on your page to sort of have a broader picture.

Whenever I had the need to know about the empty (and filled) weight of a drop tank, if the data was lacking I used to use a very simple (and ... very erroneous) rule : the empty weight of a WWII drop tank was set @ 1 pound for 1 imp.gal. It's crude & wrong but in the absence of information... You will find the application of this weird rule in the below table. The idea was that a value above this silly average should call attention...

What surprised me when reading the various above contributions was the frequent mention of steel tanks. Really ? I thought they generally were made of aluminium (or paper or various composite materials to save this strategically important alloy). Anyway, while my table summary is mainly intended for my own consumption I thought I could share it with you, should anyone be interested. Ah! Don't waste your time telling me my silly rule-of-the-thumb is wrong & silly, because ... I do know it's wrong & silly. The interresting part might be the various weights being assembled in regard of the volumes.

The table reads as follows : 1. volumes at the left on a grey background are (rounded) conversion of the originally publised data (eg: US to imp gal or the other way around) 2. extended series of volumes atop from left to right are expressed in imp.gal

Blessing to all & best regards, Pierre Deveaux, Brussels (Belgium)

1732150163792.png
 

Attachments

  • 1732149890172.png
    1732149890172.png
    84 bytes · Views: 1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back