Europe seeking to reduce ITAR exposure

Admiral Beez

Major
10,231
11,870
Joined
Oct 21, 2019
Location
Toronto, Canada
Some interesting info here about how Europe is working to reduce the risk of ITAR exposure.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFoJGHZEqAk

I expect Canada, Australia and others looking to procure defence systems will be watching closely.
 
Last edited:
While action on this front is underway, the video shown here is not a real action but rather a theoretical thought exercise.
 
While action on this front is underway, the video shown here is not a real action but rather a theoretical thought exercise.
True. SAAB has their work cut out for them.


I believe every SAAB fighter following the Rolls-Royce Avon-powered Draken has been powered by a US-derived engine. I expect the Swedes won't take to being painted into a corner without a plan to move forward.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2Cd_6BWQSo
 
Saab has denied the allegation wrt the Colombia procurement.


But hard to say what the truth is. In any case, even a plausible threat of such things will certainly cause European arms manufacturers to strive for ITAR free as far as possible.
 
As for the video linked in the OP, yeah it's a light hearted thought exercise. However it does point to a real problem in that EU defense procurement and as a result logistics is terribly fragmented. While going as far as the video proposes is politically impossible for the foreseeable future, there's certainly a lot of realistic potential in procurement cooperation.
 
So it doesn't stay just at a theoretical level, I came across 7 keys to a successful ITAR compliance and it really explains in very simple terms what ITAR compliance means in practice.
 
Last edited:
So it doesn't stay just at a theoretical level, I came across 7 keys to a successful ITAR compliance and it really explains in very simple terms what ITAR compliance means in practice.
ITAR is not really that hard if one understands it. I have worked with ITAR for 20 odd years.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back