Shortround6
Major General
The method was used, it varied according to which army and what year. WW I aircraft were doing 80-120mph near ground level (with few exceptions) and had little or no armor (again with a few exceptions) so they needed about 1/3 to 1/5 the amount of lead of most WW II aircraft. In Vietnam The Helicopters were back to WW I aircraft speeds.
Even early WW II aircraft might be engaged by rifles depending on type, Lysander? Hs 126? assorted other early tactical recon/army co-op planes (read slow). Fighters and fast bombers are much harder to hit (nothing is impossible) but proper AA guns, even rifle caliber MGs with proper sights and mounts were much more effective than scores if not hundreds of rifles.
Some officers encouraged the practice more as a means of keeping up morale than with any real expectation of stopping the air attacks. Seeing plane go down was very encouraging even it was actually hit by a machine gun 500-800yds away
BTW hits to the radiator take a number of minutes to take effect and the ground troops would rarely, if ever, see a plane force land they they had hit in a radiator or oil cooler. It would come down miles away.
Even early WW II aircraft might be engaged by rifles depending on type, Lysander? Hs 126? assorted other early tactical recon/army co-op planes (read slow). Fighters and fast bombers are much harder to hit (nothing is impossible) but proper AA guns, even rifle caliber MGs with proper sights and mounts were much more effective than scores if not hundreds of rifles.
Some officers encouraged the practice more as a means of keeping up morale than with any real expectation of stopping the air attacks. Seeing plane go down was very encouraging even it was actually hit by a machine gun 500-800yds away
BTW hits to the radiator take a number of minutes to take effect and the ground troops would rarely, if ever, see a plane force land they they had hit in a radiator or oil cooler. It would come down miles away.