This is W.Nr 8673 I presume.
Here are a few noticeable bits (some of which you may already have covered,but I can't tell from your images)
1 External reinforcing strips at fuselage/empennage join (frame 9 I think)
2 Upper,curved,part of pilots back/head armour was removed.
3 No armour glass windscreen
4 Whitewall tailwheel tyre (mainwheel tyres unknown)
5 No thin black outline to white border of swastika
6 Werknummer applied in black hand lettered script in usual place but with no W.Nr. prefix.
7 There was a large flake of paint missing from the port side of the white theatre band at the front edge about the same level as the top of the balkenkreuz horizontal arms. It appeared between victories 136 and 151,that is between 6th and 15th September. It might be the result of a bullet strike. There is evidence of a hole in at least one known photograph.
8 You've got the octane triangle in the wrong place. It was in the usual position for an F-4 above the wing root beneath the filler on the port side.
9 "Hier Aufbrocken" mark (at least on port side) is not a factory stencil. It is hand written parallel with the lower reinforcing strip on top of the new RLM 79 finish.
10 "Riefendruck 4,5 Atu" above and to the rear of the tailwheel,giving the infaltion pressure for that tyre,is a factory stencil. It was masked when the new RLM 79 was applied and therefore has a rlm 78,blue,background.
11 The oxygen filler point and external electrical socket advisory markings on the starboard side were probably overpainted. Evidence is not unequivocal.
12 Component data plate (port fin between swastika and rudder hinge) overpainted. The main data plate was not.
13 The fuselage frame numbers were not present.
14 There were no upper wing walkway lines or trim tab markings.
A lot of this was because this aircraft,an Erla built F-4/Trop,NOT and F-4Z, had been repainted and updated at depot level between being delivered to the Luftwaffe in November 1941 and its assignment to 3./JG 27 and Marseille nearly a year later. It was probably damaged and under went extensive repair,but no documentation exists to confirm or refute this.
I think your representation looks really good. The actual colour of the RLM 79 is always going to be an artisitic rather than scientific decision. I hope a couple of those points may help you make it even more accurate!
Cheers
Steve