Jan 17, 2021 #1 tomo pauk Creator of Interesting Threads 14,123 4,578 Apr 3, 2008 I'm not sure whether this was posted on the forum before. FWIW: the data about aircraft used by IJN: Attachments Japanese_Aircraft_Performance.pdf 18.7 MB · Views: 410
Jan 31, 2021 #2 P-39 Expert Non-Expert 1,810 605 Mar 12, 2018 Heath, TX Is this from IJN tests or USN tests?
Jan 31, 2021 Thread starter #3 tomo pauk Creator of Interesting Threads 14,123 4,578 Apr 3, 2008 USN just loved to write kanji.
Feb 1, 2021 #5 P-39 Expert Non-Expert 1,810 605 Mar 12, 2018 Heath, TX My question was "is this data from IJN or USN tests?" Obviously it has been translated to English.
Feb 2, 2021 #6 warbirdperformance Airman 21 27 Nov 9, 2019 Japan warbirdperformance.livedoor.blog P-39 Expert said: My question was "is this data from IJN or USN tests?" Obviously it has been translated to English. Click to expand... from IJN test This table is based on another table written in Japanese Kanji in July 1945. Tanslated and submitted to the SCAP in the aftermath of war.
P-39 Expert said: My question was "is this data from IJN or USN tests?" Obviously it has been translated to English. Click to expand... from IJN test This table is based on another table written in Japanese Kanji in July 1945. Tanslated and submitted to the SCAP in the aftermath of war.
Feb 2, 2021 #7 P-39 Expert Non-Expert 1,810 605 Mar 12, 2018 Heath, TX warbirdperformance said: from IJN test This table is based on another table written in Japanese Kanji in July 1945. Tanslated and submitted to the SCAP in the aftermath of war. Click to expand... Thanks. What is SCAP? So the A6M2 was only capable of 316mph (275knots) at 16400ft (5000 meters)? Last edited: Feb 2, 2021
warbirdperformance said: from IJN test This table is based on another table written in Japanese Kanji in July 1945. Tanslated and submitted to the SCAP in the aftermath of war. Click to expand... Thanks. What is SCAP? So the A6M2 was only capable of 316mph (275knots) at 16400ft (5000 meters)?
Feb 2, 2021 #8 warbirdperformance Airman 21 27 Nov 9, 2019 Japan warbirdperformance.livedoor.blog P-39 Expert said: Thanks. What is SCAP? Click to expand... It stands for Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers.
P-39 Expert said: Thanks. What is SCAP? Click to expand... It stands for Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers.
Feb 5, 2021 #9 Vincenzo Senior Master Sergeant 3,059 484 Dec 24, 2007 Ciociaria I think the max speed are in the japanese standard with engine at rated power not at max power
Feb 6, 2021 #10 P-39 Expert Non-Expert 1,810 605 Mar 12, 2018 Heath, TX Vincenzo said: I think the max speed are in the japanese standard with engine at rated power not at max power Click to expand... If I'm reading the chart correctly it gives takeoff power as 2550rpm and normal power as 2500rpm, not much difference at all.
Vincenzo said: I think the max speed are in the japanese standard with engine at rated power not at max power Click to expand... If I'm reading the chart correctly it gives takeoff power as 2550rpm and normal power as 2500rpm, not much difference at all.
Feb 6, 2021 #11 Vincenzo Senior Master Sergeant 3,059 484 Dec 24, 2007 Ciociaria P-39 Expert said: If I'm reading the chart correctly it gives takeoff power as 2550rpm and normal power as 2500rpm, not much difference at all. Click to expand... but they nor report the pressure that was +150 at rated power and +250 at max power
P-39 Expert said: If I'm reading the chart correctly it gives takeoff power as 2550rpm and normal power as 2500rpm, not much difference at all. Click to expand... but they nor report the pressure that was +150 at rated power and +250 at max power
Mar 15, 2023 #12 GregP Major 9,471 6,349 Jul 28, 2003 Chino, California, U.S.A. tomo pauk said: I'm not sure whether this was posted on the forum before. FWIW: the data about aircraft used by IJN: Click to expand... As usual, Tomo has an excellent post with some decent numbers. I have a copy of the original source and entered them into Excel, and expanded a bit Here it is, attached. If you find any errors, please point them out in here. Attachments Japanese Aircraft Summary.xlsx 272.1 KB · Views: 42
tomo pauk said: I'm not sure whether this was posted on the forum before. FWIW: the data about aircraft used by IJN: Click to expand... As usual, Tomo has an excellent post with some decent numbers. I have a copy of the original source and entered them into Excel, and expanded a bit Here it is, attached. If you find any errors, please point them out in here.