Improve That Design: How Aircraft Could Have Been Made Better (Cold-War Edition)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

don't know about this engine stalling due to some turbulence from the island. If there was a particular problem, I think they would have made some aerodynamic changes to the island. I don't think they did.
It was a double whammy, the obstruction turbulence of the island and the thermal convection turbulence of the stack gasses, made worse the faster the ship was going. It wasn't so much flameouts, which did occur once in a while, as momentary compressor stalls which would cause a brief reduction in thrust and a settle below glide slope into ramp strike territory. The antidote was a brief burst of power perfectly timed to coincide with the anticipated burble.
Cheers,
Wes
 
You know, I would have thought it was just to set up a potential go-around in the event of a failed approach. I guess you learn something new every day.
 

F-84 Delta; would it fly?



One more; An improved P6M;
 
Last edited:
That is interesting how Republic had such a tendency to do this...
Call it "the Thunderbolt legacy". Almost as if they were trying to rival their next door neighbors, the "Grumman iron works", except they overdid it when they didn't have access to powerplants that could handle the beef. Not 'til the mighty Thud did they get it together.
 
There are a lot of British post war jets which are worthy of many book on this subject.

All the Supermarines basically!

Always liked the look of the Mirage F.1. it just looks like a jet should. A very basic looking no frills jet.
 
There are a lot of British post war jets which are worthy of many book on this subject.

All the Supermarines basically!

Always liked the look of the Mirage F.1. it just looks like a jet should. A very basic looking no frills jet.
When you compare the delta Mirages to the swept wing Mirage F.1, one wonders why the F.1didn't do much better in the marketplace.
 
My guess is short range.

From what I've read, the F.1 had a longer range, better runway requirements, and improved agility. It may have been more expensive, though, or Dassault may have found the delta-winged Mirages much more profitable and pushed sales of the aircraft harder.
 
Last edited:
From what I read the F.1 is better pretty much in all respects to the Mirage III so odd the French moved back to the delta with 2000 and Rafale.

I remember reading the story of the test pilot on the Gloster Javelin. He was basically told to shut up. The Javelin was not a fantastic design but the RAF were buying them so any handling problem was the RAF issue now
 
Ejection seats would have been nice in the A3D and F3D, especially since landing and takeoff are the most likely times for accidents.

The F3H Demon was under-powered; it looks like the J-57 would fit and provide more power.
 
So the problems had to do with jet-aircraft in particular (the inability to take turbulent airflow into the compressor), as well as the fact that they were flying with a slight crosswind.
Actually, they weren't flying into a crosswind. Drill was (is) to steer the ship a few degrees off the wind to put the airflow as close as possible to right down the angle. This eliminates most of the crab angle the aircraft has to hold, but doesn't change the fact the airstrip is constantly sliding to starboard of a lined-up approach, necessitating a slight crab to the right. This is what nugget aviators hitting the boat for the first time after days and days of FCLP (Field Carrier Landing Practice) have the most difficulty adjusting to. Seen from the PLAT screen, the nugget lines up centered in the cross hairs (or not) and drifts inexorably toward the right edge of the screen, ultimately either taking a waveoff or making a last minute correction that has the LSOs diving for the catwalk.
Cheers,
Wes
 

Users who are viewing this thread