Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Luftwaffe Torpedo Operations 1936-40.
Luftwaffe Aerial Torpedo Aircraft and Operations in World War II, by Harold Thiele
Very true, as Thiele doesn't mention Luftwaffe combat losses at all.Hi. Thanks for the info. Does Thiele give and/or discuss Luftwaffe combat and operational losses during these missions? One of the big problems I often run across is while English language books about Luftwaffe operations are available, they seldom mention Luftwaffe losses.
Here's a good discussion concerning WWII German torpedo bomber operations.
German Torpedo Bombers? What Were they?
What impresses me most is the German Navy showed so little interest in aerial torpedoes or maritime attack aircraft in general that the entire program finally transferred to Luftwaffe control during January 1942.
Seems like the better solution would have been to replace Admiral Raeder around 1935 with someone who had an appreciation for naval attack aircraft. Then serious development of this powerful weapon system could have begun seven years earlier.
Seems like the better solution would have been to replace Admiral Raeder around 1935 with someone who had an appreciation for naval attack aircraft. Then serious development of this powerful weapon system could have begun seven years earlier.
It needs to be remembered that Raeder built up the fleet in the pre-war period in the belief that the Royal Navy would not be the enemy, and that the German navy would operate mainly in the Baltic, well within range of land based aircraft support. He was also under the assumption that war would not occur until around 1944.I think Goering had more say so than Raeder, I'm not sure but I think that even the aircraft on the Graf Zeppelin carriers would have been Luftwaffe rather than Kriegsmarine.
You are correct.I think Goering had more say so than Raeder, I'm not sure but I think that even the aircraft on the Graf Zeppelin carriers would have been Luftwaffe rather than Kriegsmarine.
AS an example of how ridiculous this can get I was told many years ago by a tour guide at the Smithsonian Silver Hill facility ( OK, I don't Know if it is true) that by law NONE of the Smithsonian aircraft are airworthy. This in response to question about a Cessna Bird dog on exhibit. Tour guide claimed it landed on the air strip outside the building and then had it's airworthiness stripped (could not legally fly out). Back in the 30s the congress didn't want the Smithsonian to become a 4th (?) US Air Force after the Army, Navy and Coast Guard so declared that any aircraft donated to/acquired by the museum should be "non-flight worthy".
I believe ( but am open to correction) that even the float-planes on the battleships/cruisers were flown by Luftwaffe pilots.
The Smithsonian is the national Museum and as such is funded by congress.