OA- 4M engine question

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Hoggardhigh

Airman 1st Class
224
43
Jan 6, 2014
United States
In Joe Baugher's entry on the OA- 4M (TA-4F retrofitted to A-4M standards), it states the following about the OA-4M's power plant:

"Some consideration was given to fitting the 11,200 lb.s.t Pratt & Whitney J52-P-408 of the A-4M, but this turned out to be impractical, and the OA-4M retained the J52-P-8 of the TA-4F."

Can anyone here explain more about the above quote?
 
In Joe Baugher's entry on the OA- 4M (TA-4F retrofitted to A-4M standards), it states the following about the OA-4M's power plant:

"Some consideration was given to fitting the 11,200 lb.s.t Pratt & Whitney J52-P-408 of the A-4M, but this turned out to be impractical, and the OA-4M retained the J52-P-8 of the TA-4F."

Can anyone here explain more about the above quote?
The OA-4M was a two-seater A-4 converted from the TA-4F trainer by the addition of combat gear similar to a "warfighter" A-4 for use as a "fast FAC" in Vietnam after the attrition rate of low and slow O-1s and O-2s became unsustainable.
The A-4M was the "hotrod" A-4 single seater attack plane procured for the Marines after the Navy had withdrawn their A-4s from frontline attack squadrons. The OA-4M (Observation Attack) was supposed to be a two seat equivalent of the A-4M, but retrofitting the "hotrod" version J52 turned out to be impractical for reasons unknown. I have heard "through the grapevine" that intake ducts of the lower powered TA-4F airfame couldn't feed the airflow demands of the P408 engine and the tailpipe duct was too tight a fit and overheated.
Apparently the development took too long and the war was over before the aircraft were delivered. I did see the Blue Angels perform in their Ms in 1974, and they were awesome! No afterburner, but it performed like it had one, and its crisp handling allowed a tighter, more impressive show than the F-4s the Angels had before.
Cheers,
Wes
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back