Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Quite similar. The image was displayed on a green fluorescent screen. It was a "proximity focus" IR image converter. The imagers used these days are FAR more sensitive.So the IR system was probably similar to the 'Tabby' series of equipment, which used the converter tube you referenced?
"CV14x Range of Infra-red Converter Cells"
With the converter tube being mounted on a monocular/binocular body?
720nm is a deep red, just on the edge of being infrared. If you can't see IR, no filter will magically make it appear. IR is around 850nm and longer wavelength.An IR "pass" or "viewing" filter blocks light waves below 720nm, allowing IR light to be visible to the human eye.
I have personally used such filters, both photographically, and with IR viewing goggles, to photograph or view objects illuminated by a IR light source.
µmInfrared is divided into groups:
Near, Short, Mid, Long and Far.
Near's wavelength is .75 to 1.4 nm.
Short's wavelength is 1.4 to 3 nm.
Mid's wavelength is 3 to 8 nm.
Long's wavelength is 8 to 15 nm.
Far's wavelength is 15 to 1K nm.
A device so secret no mention of it exists in the aircraft manual or anywhere else?Good morning Gents,
Wow, thank you for all the replies. I understand the conjecture. Certainly because of the limited information of such a device. The name of the company founders was helpful to me as this will take some real searching. The device and technology was actual, installed on the P-38 aircraft wing facing forward, and it was classified. The detector was unknown to me, most likely an easy device to operate in the "shack". Perhaps the PMT (photo multiplier tube).
The emission device, what I'm referring to as a "laser" was also a tube. A vacuum tube. With no metal inside to pollute the plasma. The active gas was (is) CO2, a well know and the first gas to be used in a (gas) laser type format. It was RF excited from the outside.
From what I believe I was told at the time that I was in Dana Point, CA meeting with the founders. Doing some simple investigation, Peter Laakmann was born in 1936, so he would not of been involved personally at the later parts of WW2 with anything at apx. age of 8. I am attempting to contact his partner Katherine Corthall as Mr. Laakmann has passed in attempt to offer some clarification if any.
I would say however that posting this inquiry here on this forum has helped myself more that I expected. Believing that the Japanese zeros were in fact preforming touch & go maneuvers on remote air bases is very believable. Some flying at night I'm sure might as well be lost and failed to notice what landing strip they were centering up on during their down wind leg. I believe the story came from one of them whom I met during the final stages of the ownership while I was being introduced to the lab and the people, products.
If and when I can dig up more on this P-38 installed wing hardware, I will post it here.
Thanks again, Doug
Can you not post a picture of one of the documents ?mjfur, it was only installed on a few aircraft. It was an invention under test. Not for use in every aircraft everywhere. From what I was told, the technology and device was only installed for experimental use. This is how taking experiments from the lab to the field works. That is what I do, R&D. Thanks for your reply.
A PMT (photomultiplier tube) is a very sensitive detector that can detect even single photons if used properly. It is, however limited in its wavelength to primarily visible light. Some PMTshave been developed with longer wavelength cathodes but those are rare. To do any practical target discrimination, the source would need to be modulated with a code.Good morning Gents,
Wow, thank you for all the replies. I understand the conjecture. Certainly because of the limited information of such a device. The name of the company founders was helpful to me as this will take some real searching. The device and technology was actual, installed on the P-38 aircraft wing facing forward, and it was classified. The detector was unknown to me, most likely an easy device to operate in the "shack". Perhaps the PMT (photo multiplier tube).
The emission device, what I'm referring to as a "laser" was also a tube. A vacuum tube. With no metal inside to pollute the plasma. The active gas was (is) CO2, a well know and the first gas to be used in a (gas) laser type format. It was RF excited from the outside.
From what I believe I was told at the time that I was in Dana Point, CA meeting with the founders. Doing some simple investigation, Peter Laakmann was born in 1936, so he would not of been involved personally at the later parts of WW2 with anything at apx. age of 8. I am attempting to contact his partner Katherine Corthall as Mr. Laakmann has passed in attempt to offer some clarification if any.
I would say however that posting this inquiry here on this forum has helped myself more that I expected. Believing that the Japanese zeros were in fact preforming touch & go maneuvers on remote air bases is very believable. Some flying at night I'm sure might as well be lost and failed to notice what landing strip they were centering up on during their down wind leg. I believe the story came from one of them whom I met during the final stages of the ownership while I was being introduced to the lab and the people, products.
If and when I can dig up more on this P-38 installed wing hardware, I will post it here.
Thanks again, Doug
Those cameras are "Thermal Imagers" and operate in the long IR region.Infra red is a spectrum, not all IR has the same properties. I cant figure out whether the discussion is of intensifying near IR or using true infra red or using laser light which came after 1960. I used infra red cameras in 1989 to do all sorts of "stuff". They were the type that produce images that you frequently see in music videos. They can tell which parts of a circuit board are running hot and which arent, where a canal in Saudi has a small leak or which furnace tubes are running hot because they are thinned by corrosion. However they cannot "see" through glass. There is a table in here that explains a bit of it Infrared - Wikipedia
Exactly, but every man and his dog will call it an "Infra Red Camera" I was confused by the lens, since the camera couldnt see through glass. It looked like a glass lens with a gold coating like Astronauts had on their visors, but I was told its actually a tricky ceramic compound.Those cameras are "Thermal Imagers" and operate in the long IR region.