Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I've dealt with the carrier speed issue. Max 19 not 30 knots. But what about no ammo and minimal fuel?The P-47s were given just enough fuel to get to their new base, and had no ammunition in them ... they were LIGHT ... at least, for a P-47 they were light. The carrier would steam into the wind at 30+ knots and they could make it off, but could not land back aboard.
Fascinating, thanks for posting. I think this was the mission they mentioned in the caption of the photo I posted in the OP. They said they were basically launched as CAP to intercept some dive bombers, from the carrier. That was what surprised me so much. Very interesting!I've dealt with the carrier speed issue. Max 19 not 30 knots. But what about no ammo and minimal fuel?
The first group flew ashore on 22nd June and flew their first combat mission 4 hours after landing (a rocket strike on Tinian). On 23rd June the two CVE were attacked. The response was to launch 4xP-47 on CAP which later flew onto Saipan. They would hardly be unarmed for that. And if they really intended to pare the weight down to an absolute minimum why fit drop tanks, even if empty? They were launched from 60 miles offshore.
This video shows the prep for the launch (incl fitting drop tanks and work of some kind on the wing guns) as well as the launchings themselves
HD Stock Video Footage - U.S. Army Air Force P-47 aircraft take off from USS Manila Bay, underway off the coast of Saipan, during World War II.
View 73rd Fighter Squadron vintage historic HD stock video footage in Pacific Ocean, 1944. Buy HD video and archival still photo images of clip number 65675047538.www.criticalpast.com
Remove the nose armour and heaterEscort carriers can make 30 knots?
It doesn't stay with the aircraft. It gets caught by the bridle catcher at the end of the catapult track. Watch again and you can see a chap recovering it from over the forward end of the flight deck after the aircraft has gone. Once the aircraft gains sufficient speed the undercart can be retracted. The launch is really no different from any other carrier aircraft.Anyone know more about the catapult cable?
Obviously its securely attached to the landing gear, and stays with the plane after takeoff.
Did it get in the way raising the gear and closing the doors?
Or maybe, if it was just a short jaunt to shore, they left the gear down?
They were at least once launched with fuel and ammo to drive off attacking Japanese planes then flown on to their destination when the enemy was cleared. The P-47 could be and was catapult launched. I have seen a photo of a TBM/TBF being launched out the side of a hanger deck.
days from now some retard somewhere on the net will claim these are original untouched photos.
days from now some retard somewhere on the net will claim these are original untouched photos.
The condensed version of that paragraph is: "War Thunder"...days from now some retard somewhere on the net will claim these are original untouched photos.
Fixed cross-hangar deck catapults were a feature of US carrier designs from CV-4 Ranger through to the Essex class. More information and photos about them here..... I have seen a photo of a TBM/TBF being launched out the side of a hanger deck.
They didn't, but a P-51 was tested for carrier landing.I don't think they made any USAAF planes with arrestor hooks, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong. I think they did fly STOL planes like L-4 'grasshopper' etc. this way maybe? For sure they launched some at Torch but maybe they landed on shore.
With radial engine aircraft you have one less liquid needed on board, that being coolant. Additionally, aside from being a bit more robust, there are maintenance advantages with radials, the ability to change individual cylinder heads for one.It's interesting that the US and Japan seemed to go 100% (or close to that?) radial engine for their naval aircraft while the RN liked to use liquid cooled engines.
There were several tested:I don't think they made any USAAF planes with arrestor hooks, but I'm prepared to be proven wrong. I think they did fly STOL planes like L-4 'grasshopper' etc. this way maybe? For sure they launched some at Torch but maybe they landed on shore.
The problem encountered with the P-51s, was it's stall speed.That said if you could make one land on a carrier Ok, a P-51 with it's long range and high cruise speed would probably have made a good carrier plane.