KraziKanuK
Banned
- 792
- Jan 26, 2005
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
KraziKanuK said:Royal Air Force airmen killed: 537
Luftwaffe Airmen killed: 2,662
Me109 and 110 airmen killed: 549
Royal Air Force aircraft lost: 1,017
Luftwaffe aircraft lost: 1,882
Me109 and 110 aircraft lost: 871
Aprox 95% of all RAF aircraft lost were shot down by 109's
Did they actually have a 1,180 mi. range with full internal and external fuel load?
And if it actually did carry more fuel than the other spits, why was it still lighter than the Mk.IX (fully loaded)?
I've read in www.spitfireworld.com that the Mk. IX (at least late versions) had wing tanks AND a rear fuselage tank. If so, then why did all other sources say it only had 980 mi. of range?
If they could go a 1,000 miles, they could have made it to Berlin.
MANOEUVRABILITY
SPITFIRE TURNING DIAMETER = 1,760 feet. BF 109 TURNING DIAMETER = 1,500 ft.
A Spitfire pilot will tell you the Spit could turn inside the 109. A Messerschmitt pilot will tell you the 109 could turn inside the Spitfire! The truth is that both designs were capable of turning circles that would cause the pilot to "black-out" as the blood drained from the head. The pilot who could force himself to the limits without losing consciousness would emerge the victor from a turning battle, and the Spitfire pilots had supreme faith in their machine. The British aeronautical press told them that the wings came off the 109 in a dive or in tight turns, untrue but based on some early wing failures in the 109`s predecessor the Bf108.
However the 109 had a distinct advantage in manoeuvrability and turning circle at low speeds. The design of the 109, with it's leading edge slats gave a lower stalling speed. The 109 was very forgiving if stalled, with no tendency for a stall to develop into an uncontrollable spin, something that the Spitfire was prone to. Thus a Messerschmitt pilot was more at home at low speeds than his British counterpart.
.
SPITFIRE TURNING DIAMETER = 1,760 feet. BF 109 TURNING DIAMETER = 1,500 ft.
At 3g DATCOM is listing at max AoA at SL
Hurricane Mk1 (7691lbs)
Speed = 162mph
Rate = 21.9dps
Radius = 621ft
Wow, 109E is dangerously close to Hurrie - the slats overcome the big wingloading deficit?
What is DATCOM? Would this program be based on reported stall #s? Clmax or Clman? Wing properties?
How does any aircaft acheive high alpha? I heard one aero engineer say that once you are into high angle it is less airfoil section and more about wingload/powerload.