Dear gentlemen,
Some early WWII fighters (e.g. Morane 406, I-16, Ki-27) still have the typical WWI tailskid in lieu of the more modern tailwheel. Beyond reasons of this choice, I wonder if it could be considered, from a physical and practical point of view, more similar to a swivelling or locked tailwheel. I guess that its behaviour should be different on grass airfields in respect of paved runways (given that it was suitable also for these latter), but just can't figure how much it could keep takeoff run straight (also avoiding ground loop) in respect to a locked tailwheel. Maybe a silly question, but I'm curious since I never flew in RL an aicraft with tailskid.
Cheers,
GB
Some early WWII fighters (e.g. Morane 406, I-16, Ki-27) still have the typical WWI tailskid in lieu of the more modern tailwheel. Beyond reasons of this choice, I wonder if it could be considered, from a physical and practical point of view, more similar to a swivelling or locked tailwheel. I guess that its behaviour should be different on grass airfields in respect of paved runways (given that it was suitable also for these latter), but just can't figure how much it could keep takeoff run straight (also avoiding ground loop) in respect to a locked tailwheel. Maybe a silly question, but I'm curious since I never flew in RL an aicraft with tailskid.
Cheers,
GB