Warm up an engine

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Two other points.

The Japanese engine oils were similar in quality to the other nations.

The RN/FAA did not drain the oil out of their aircraft when stowing them below (I know you were being sarcastic Admiral Beez, but others may not). They did, however, normally drain the aviation fuel from the aircraft when stowing them below. This was done to prevent/reduce the chance of fires in the hangar. This also prevented the warm-up of engines in the hangar.
 

I worked in Kiruna Sweden for a while while working at the Iron Ore Mines. The car parks at all of the hotels had a standard outlet for keeping automobiles pugged in over night. Both the engine and the passenger compartment was kept warm. The power draw I think was 300W. (Narvik is less than an hour from this, its where Operation Wilfred tried to cut of the German Iron ore supply)

The Russians diluted their oil with petrol and the Germans copied them. Once the engine was up to heat the petrol evaporated off.
 
We seem to be mixing systems to warm the oil up enough to start the engine, with systems with enough power to warm the entire engine so it can develop full power safely.
Warming the oil so it flows enough to lubricate may speed the overall warmup some, but the engine internals ( pistons, rings, cylinder walls, etc.) need to be hot and expanded before you go to full power, or parts break.
About the only way to do that dependably is to run the engine.
 

Electric heaters are common but you still have to warm the engine up further after starting. When I used to fly up north with temps regularly below freezing we would keep the aircraft hangared over night. We would preflight in the hangar as much as possible, but sometimes could not, or sometimes the flight would be delayed. We would put electric heaters inside the cowlings, but they would not raise the temp to operating levels. They just kept the oil at a temp you can start the engine at.
 

We've got one fitted, but don't use it. It's a pad that gets stuck onto the outside of the tank. We stopped using it after it almost caused a fire though!
 
We've got one fitted, but don't use it. It's a pad that gets stuck onto the outside of the tank. We stopped using it after it almost caused a fire though!

I'm curios what caused the fire precisely? Was there a 5 Y analysis you are aware of?

It sounds like an aftermarket retrofit. Engine and airframe makers need to incorporate them as a properly engineered solution. Lube and grease system heaters are often rubbish in any industry. Folks regard them as a simple device and won't spend money on them because they don't perceive the risks of a poorly engineered product.. You can spend anywhere between $150 to $2500 on a heater for a 44gallon or 200L grease drum. I've seen the cheap ones cause a drum to smoke and others to blow a 1 mm hole in the side. A heater pack should be either so low in power and power density and so well fitted it can't overheat or incorporate 2 failsafe thermal cut out devices, say a thermostat and a positive temperature coefficient cutout.

Even Jets need to warm up. The Pratt & Whitney PW1000G geared turbofans needed 8 minutes to warm up at one point, 2-3 minutes worse than previous generations negating some fuel savings. (Now fixed incidentally). There is low hanging fruit in fuel savings in preheating oil and electric ground taxiing wheras engine and airframe makers struggle to get 0.5% savings.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread