What plane do you wish had sawservice

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

It was never built past a wooden mockup stage. The type II prototype was built however it was never flown.

 

Attachments

  • ki94ii-3_707.jpg
    44 KB · Views: 577
  • ki94ii-1_132.jpg
    29.9 KB · Views: 586
  • ki94ii_154.jpg
    51.7 KB · Views: 581
  • ki941_145.jpg
    44.9 KB · Views: 590
  • ki941-1_523.jpg
    48.7 KB · Views: 587
It looks structurally unsound to me. I doubt it could have executed high G manuvers.
 
The Type I probably not, but the Type II inwhich a prototype was built probably could have. If you look though she is a traditional fighter and not of a twin tail boom design. The last 3 pictures are of a Type 2, the top 2 are of the wooden mock up of the Type I.
 
I was only considering the type I, the type II is nothing special at all, it lacks the rear engine and is just a very big fighter which would have been grossly underpowered.
 
Yes the XP-54, 55 and 56 were developed under the concept of "strange aircraft" but they didnt possess any real advantages over normal aircraft so they were never accepted...
 
XP-55 (July 1943 - notice swept wings)


XP-56 (Sept. 1944 - notice swept wings)


=S=

Lunatic
 
Just pointing out that swept wings were being invesitaged in the US as early as 1943.
 
RG_Lunatic said:
I was only considering the type I, the type II is nothing special at all, it lacks the rear engine and is just a very big fighter which would have been grossly underpowered.

With 2,400 hp ? I can tell you the P-47 was bigger, and most had a less powerful engine aswell, however i never hear you mention that fighter as underpowered !

Btw don't be fouled by the workers small size in comparison to the a/c, as Jap's were usually very small back then. (Remember how Allied test-pilots felt in a Zero cockpit ? )
 
Yeah I was just about to say the same thing except that Soren the P-47 was slightly smaller.

Ki-94-II
High-altitude Fighter
Crew: One
Powerplant: One Nakajima [Ha-44]12 18-cyl., air-cooled radial
rated at a maximum of 2,450hp.
Armaments: Two 30mm Ho-105 cannon, two 20mm Ho-5 cannon;
can carry one 1,102lb. bomb
Speed:
Max Speed at sea level: NA
Maximum Speed projected at: 442mph at 39,370ft.
Range: 1,305 miles
Climb: 17min. 38sec. to 32,810ft.
Ceiling: 48,170ft.
Dimensions:
Span: 45ft. 11 3/16in.
Length: 39ft. 4 7/16in.
Height: 15ft. 3 1/16in.
Wing Area: 301.388 sq. ft.
Weights:
Empty: 10,340lbs.
Loaded: 14,220lbs.
Deployed: One prototype produced, one partially built

P-47 Thunderbolt
Type: Fighter-Bomber
Manufacturer: Republic
Crew: One
First Flight: May 6, 1941
Service Delivery: June 1942 (56th Fighter Group)
Final Delivery: N/A
Production: 15,677

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dimensions:
Wing Span: 40 ft. 9.25 in. (12.43m)
Length: 36 ft. 1.75 in. (11.02m)
Height: 14 ft. 8 in. (4.47m)
Wing Area: 300.0 sq. ft (27.87m2)

Weights:
Empty: 9,950 lb. (4513 kg)
Maximum Take-Off: 17,500 lb. (7938 kg.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance:
Max. Speed, Clean: 433 mph (697 km/h)
Service Ceiling: 41,000 ft. (12495m
Range with drop tanks: 1,00 miles (3058m)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Armament:
Eight 12.7mm (0.5 in.) machine guns in wings

Bombload:
Up to 2,500 lb. (1134 kg) of bombs carried externally

Powerplant:
XP-47B:
Model: Pratt Whitney XR-2800 Double Wasp
Type: Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 1,850 hp (later 2,000 hp)

P-47B:
Model: Pratt Whitney R-2800-21 Double Wasp
Type: Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,000 hp

Later P-47C:
Model: Pratt Whitney R-2800-59 Double Wasp
Type: Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,300 hp

P-47D:
Model: P&W R-2800-21W or -51W Double Wasp
Type: Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,300 hp or 2,535 hp

XP-47H:
Model: Chrysler XIV-2220-1
Type: Inverted Vee Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,300 hp

XP-47J:
Model: Pratt Whitney R-2800-57 (C) Double Wasp
Type: Turbocharged Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,800 hp

P-47N:
Model: Pratt Whitney R-2800-77 Double Wasp
Type: Radial Piston Engine.
Number: One Horsepower: 2,800 hp


So lets see. The Ki-94-II was only about 3ft bigger then the P-47. The wing span was about 5 ft bigger then the P-47 though, which did give the Ki-94 more wing area. Height was only about 1ft more for the Ki-94-II. Only the P-47J, M, N had more powerful engines then the Ki-94-II so I dont think the Ki-94-II would have been as bad you think it would have RG_Lunatic. I dont know though since it never flew but you cant say it would have been all that bad either since well basically you dont know.
 
I would have liked that Ki-94 mk-1, it might not have flown well or at all, but with a little work it might be nice. But it would look like the cockpit would be very hot evenif it was under pressure.

How about the midget fighters that were to hang under the bombers!
 
The Japanese proved over and over they were unable to make such an engine. "Designing" it and printing an HP number on a tech sheet does not mean anything. That goes for all these fantasy specs, they are all based upon nothing but smoke and wishful thinking of the Japanese engineers and military personel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread