Which other countries had "suicidal" aircrew in WW2?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Snautzer01 said:
I have some docs i will put up when i am back home.
Click to expand...
swampyankee said:
...but unlikely to be able to do so.
Click to expand...

Most likely, hence why the command did not use the Fi 103R. They considered it a waste of human recourses.

Even the SonderKommando Elbe was only used once.

German culture is not like the Japanese one. You were not going to find swarms of German pilots seeking an honorable death by suicide.
 

Deliberately to invite as wide a discussion as possible - and at Midway the crews knew they had insufficient fuel to return to base so would have to ditch and hope for retrieval which is far more risky than removing armour.
 
Last edited:
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
I would not classify these Australian pilots/crews or the American pilots as suicidal. They are accepting certain risks to accomplish a mission, but their mission was not to die to accomplish the mission.
Click to expand...

The same could be said of the Japanese pilots who believed that increased maneuverability was better protection and increased their chances of beating their opponent.
 
yeh. Oldtimers disease is better than the alternative tho
 
One of the first operations of B-26 bombers lost all A/C but that wasnt the fault of the aircrew, but poor planning tactics of those that decided on the mission. During the BoB many pilots were lost chasing LW fighters or bombers across the Channel despite orders not to do so. Young men underestimate danger and overestimate their abilities (ask an insurance company). Chasing a plane across the Pas de Calais was reckless to the point of stupidity, they were flying into the biggest concentration of LW fighters anywhere in Europe and when they broke off they had to make their way back through LW planes returning to base. If you keep taking that risk you will eventually lose, which is what happened, but until they lost they considered they were good at it.
 
To my knowledge it was Stier and a blockade runner. So only one German combat ship.

The two ships got very close due to fog.

I wouldn't say it was suicidal although it was certainly mutually destructive.
 
The Basket said:
To my knowledge it was Stier and a blockade runner. So only one German combat ship.

The two ships got very close due to fog.

I wouldn't say it was suicidal although it was certainly mutually destructive.
Click to expand...
I was going by memory, having read the story decades ago, so I did a bit of searching and found it:

DKM Stier (HSK6/Schiff 23)
Armament:
6) 15cm guns
1) 75mm gun
1) twin-mount 3.7cm gun
4) 2cm guns
2) 21" torpedo tubes

MS Tannenfels
Armament:
1) 15cm gun
?) 3.7cm guns
?) 2cm guns

SS Stephen Hopkins
Armament:
1) 4" (102mm) gun
2) 3.7cm guns
6) .50 Mgs

On the morning of 27 September 1942, the Stier, accompanied by Tannenfels attempted to halt the Hopkins at 8:55 a.m. and the Hopkins came about and attacked both the Stier and Tannenfels.
The combined fire from Stier and Tannenfels overwhelmed the Hopkins, but not before damaging the Tannenfels and inflicting severe damage to the Stier, which eventually sank an hour and fourty minutes after the battle.
The Stephen Hopkins is the only merchant ship to have sunk a German surface ship during the war.
 
Did the blockade runner fire on the Stephen Hopkins?

My memory is as riddled with holes as the Yamato.
 
I think the closest to "suicidal" I can think of, is the destroyer escorts and destroyers of the US Navy in the Battle of Leyte Gulf. In my estimation. every one of those sailors deserves a Navy Cross. They attacked the Japanese Central Force knowing that they couldn't sink a cruiser or battleship once they ran out of torpedoes, yet they attacked time and again.
 
Considering that the OP's definition of "suicidal" regarded stripping of gear meant to protect the craft, and also that many others chiming in are thinking in terms of a suicide mission no matter the gear, I'm cutting the baby in half and saying HMS Campbeltown in its raid on St Nazaire. Sailing in a ship stripped of much useful gear, those Commandos knew going in that they'd have to find their way back to different bottoms to get home safely.

Many didn't. It was suicidal either way you cut the cake.
 
While they certainly weren't aircrew, one wonders if one should include the Rangers at the Pointe du Hoc. One day, when I was substitute teaching, a teacher brought in her grandfather, who was with the Rangers there, to talk to the students (they were in 3rd grade). While the kids could tell the memories were still making him very sad, I don't think they could understand (nor can I) just how horrible that day was, just that it brought tears to an old man over sixty-five years after the events.
 
33k in the air said:
You can take heart from the fact that Yamato was eventually turned into an excellent space battleship which defeated both the Gamilons and the Comet Empire!
Click to expand...
I have literally no idea what you're talking about.

I find it most disturbing that no one has mentioned eating field rations or eating in the mess.

Take your life in your hands.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

Other countries' Dauntless?
2
Replies
29
Views
3K
Alan Stevens
A
German WW2 seaplane bases
Replies
1
Views
574
Dimlee
A
Perun: Building the Worst WW2 Air Force
Replies
12
Views
873
swampyankee
SMGs in ww2 with much smaller cartridges?
2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Admiral Beez
A
A
How did B-17 and B-24 formations avoid shooting each other?
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
5K
Peter Gunn
Menu
Log in
Register