Schwarzpanzer, please lay off the crack.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:Ive shot the K98 and found it a pleasure to shoot.
The StG.44 has all advantages over the M1 Garand.
Since the SLR holds it's own side by having superior firepower to the M-16
being more reliable than the M-16
being sturdier than the M-16 amongst other aspects.
The StG.44 matches the Garand in single-shot firepower
and it has automatic fire giving it fire superiority !
Surely you could provide something in the way of evidence of this 'classic Spitfire bounce' ?
From who's account ?
How was that, in any way, a contradiction?
The SLR holds superior firepower because of the 7.62mm rounds it uses. The M-16s 5.56mm is well known to be under-powered.
Firepower and range are two different things. Do you know anything about the English language? Evidently not! Stand 300 metres away, and I'll shot you once with both weapons ... you're going to die either way.
The SLR is still more reliable than the M-16.
The StG.44 was sturdy, I'd like to see your jaw withstand being smacked with one.
Drop a StG.44, and rarely will it break apart.
I was refering to the SLR being more sturdy than the M-16 which it so obviously is.
the SLR vs. M-16 accounts were all right on my part. Which you avoided.
I don't care if it was a fluke, because until you show some source for it happening. It didn't happen.
Your grandads ... alright. And nothing to back that up ?
At least I provide my evidence in full , even if you do instantly call it bias.