muscogeemike
Senior Airman
According to what I've read (and people here know a lot more than me) Curtiss Wright started developing the R-2600 radial engine in 1935. What if someone, and the USAAC and USN, had developed fighters around this engine? I know it was used on several bombers (the A-20, B-25, TBF) and it had problems until late in the war but if enough emphasis was put on the project couldn't the US have had a fighter with about the same capabilities of the La-5 (the R-2600 developed about the same power, 16-1700 hp, as the La-5's engine) at the start of the war?
I know that the La-5 would not have met the strategic requirement of long range bomber escort and the USSR had problems with it for a while; but wouldn't a plane like it have been valuable in the defensive battles at the start of the war? Instead of the P-36, P-39/400, P-40, F2B and F4F; we might have had a much more capable fighter at Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Northern Australia and over New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.
And if the project were really pushed could we have this fighter (or a version of it) early enough to supply to European countries prior to 1939 or the fall of France? I would think that may have had a lot of influence on the early stages of the war.
I know that the La-5 would not have met the strategic requirement of long range bomber escort and the USSR had problems with it for a while; but wouldn't a plane like it have been valuable in the defensive battles at the start of the war? Instead of the P-36, P-39/400, P-40, F2B and F4F; we might have had a much more capable fighter at Pearl Harbor, the Philippines, Northern Australia and over New Guinea and the Solomon Islands.
And if the project were really pushed could we have this fighter (or a version of it) early enough to supply to European countries prior to 1939 or the fall of France? I would think that may have had a lot of influence on the early stages of the war.