- Thread starter
-
- #101
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Reduction ratio here Rolls-Royce Merlin. Engine data.Just to be clear on something, and this might sound stupid: The listed RPM -- is that the propeller's RPM or just the engine and how do you conclude the propeller's RPM if you have the engine RPM?
The reduction gears seem to run through a range -- is this do deal with different propeller installations?Reduction ratio here Rolls-Royce Merlin. Engine data.
I post on a forum I am not an engineer of aircraft, as a guess I would say its different use/ prop diameter.The reduction gears seem to run through a range -- is this do deal with different propeller installations?
D Deleted member 68059 &swampyankee
What formulas do you use to convert the advance ratio figures into thrust?
Okay, so at the penalty of sounding stupidProp efficiency is advance ratio times (thrust coefficient divide by power coefficient), so thrust coefficient is equal to (efficiency times power coefficient) divided by advance ratio.
Okay, so at the penalty of sounding stupid
Additionally, I could use figures that are based around imperial/english units () since those were heavily used in WWII.
- What does thrust coefficient mean in plain english?
- What does power coefficient mean in plain english?
- Out of all of this, where does exact thrust figures come out?
Thanks
With a jet engine the pounds of thrust is not a constant either, it varies depending on all sorts of variables.Just to be clear, what I'm trying to compute is thrust -- pounds of thrust, newtons, etc, at given speeds. If you want to determine sustained turning performance and climb rates you need to know how much OOOMPF comes out the engines -- with jets it's just "pounds of thrust" or "newtons" depending on what measurement system you're using. I'm trying to get figures like that.
True, but you know what I mean -- I'm trying to determine pounds of thrust.With a jet engine the pounds of thrust is not a constant either, it varies depending on all sorts of variables.
You have been given them, as with almost every subject you want a simple solution to very complex issues. A jet engine thrust obviously changes with altitude, it changes with temperature, it changes with speed and it changes while manouvering from what I have read as airflow to the inlet changes. So for a jet you need an equation for actual thrust, the quoted thrust for a jet will be in a certain test condition, used to compare to other engines in the same/similar test condition.True, but you know what I mean -- I'm trying to determine pounds of thrust.
Advance ratios seem fairly generalized speed versus engine power and RPM. It seems to include exhaust thrust as that's part of the speed. I just need some way to take the advance ratios and turn that into thrust numbers.
No, I haven't -- at least I don't think I haveYou have been given them
Efficiency is how good something is at doing something. If a gear box and differential is 90% efficient then 90% of the power going in is transmitted to the wheels, the rest is lost. I would say the rest of it requires a lot of knowledge/experience like a degree and cant be imparted in a single post. The blade angle of a CV prop depends on the power load at the time I believe.No, I haven't -- at least I don't think I have
This link: Aerodynamic Characteristics of Propellers talks about efficiency, but I don't know what kind of efficiency we're talking about -- what does an efficiency of 0.8 mean? 80% of what?
This link: https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap/article/viewFile/558/390 talks about the propeller efficiency provided the blade angles and geometry are known. This is not data I have. I'm just trying to convert he advance ratio into thrust. Is there anyway to do that -- if the answer is no, I can probably still create some large graphs that would provide some use as they're large and highly detailed but would tell me I could avoid bothering trying to compute thrust; if yes -- I'm just trying to find a thrust figure.
T/W helps one determine the angle you could climb at without loss of speed, and would probably also help determine what would happen if the horsepower were increased and decreased. I'm sure that would be useful to somebody.
I'm aware of that, the problem is 80% of what?Efficiency is how good something is at doing something.
I thought you were discussing propellors?I'm aware of that, the problem is 80% of what?
The issue isn't an understanding of something like efficiency, I'm just not even sure what the 80% even is for? Thrust to drag? And where do you get the thrust and drag from -- at least if I knew the drag I could probably get the thrust right?
Efficiency is defined as useful work out divided by energy in. For a propeller, that would be airspeed (in feet per second) times thrust (in pounds) divided by (horsepower multiplied by 550) or, equivalently, airspeed (in meters per second) times thrust (in newtons) divided by power (in watts).I'm aware of that, the problem is 80% of what?
The issue isn't an understanding of something like efficiency, I'm just not even sure what the 80% even is for? Thrust to drag? And where do you get the thrust and drag from -- at least if I knew the drag I could probably get the thrust right?