WWIIAIRCRAFTPERFORMANCE.COM

[bada]

Hi,
wwiiaircraftperformance.com will be down on thursday and/or Friday for maintenance.

 

[bada]

wwiiaircraftperformance.COM back online with new responsive layout.

If you encounter any issue, any broken link or file missing. Please contact me asap, using the contact page, or simply here in this thread. Thank you.

 

[YavorD]

wwiiaircraftperformance.COM back online with new responsive layout.

If you encounter any issue, any broken link or file missing. Please contact me asap, using the contact page, or simply here in this thread. Thank you.

A click on the "New Responsive Layout / United States / P-40" [WWII Aircraft Performance - World War II Aircraft Performance Data] returns "404" [404 - Page Not Found]

 

[ThomasP]

For me, the links for

P-36 - fixed
P-39 - fixed
P-43 - fixed
P-63 - fixed
Spitfire II
Spitfire XIV
Spitfire 21
Fury and Sea Fury
Hornet
Vampire
Halifax
Lancaster
Me 109 E


all return "404 Page Not Found"

 

[bada]

A click on the "New Responsive Layout / United States / P-40" [WWII Aircraft Performance - World War II Aircraft Performance Data] returns "404" [404 - Page Not Found]

Thanks, Solved.
Looks like the hosting server is more demanding than "wamp" for the difference between small and capital letters.

 

[bada]

For me, the links for

P-36 - fixed
P-39 - fixed
P-43 - fixed
P-63 - fixed
Spitfire II
Spitfire XIV
Spitfire 21
Fury and Sea Fury
Hornet
Vampire
Halifax
Lancaster
Me 109 E


all return "404 Page Not Found"

solved

 

[ThomasP]

Hey bada,

Seriously, thanks for taking the time to do this stuff.

We owe you, and all the others who maintain these sites - whether it is the people who put up the original sites, or those who later take over the maintenance and continuing evolution.

 

[bada]

Thanks.
I thought about expanding the old website a little, so if anyone has some new data/article about aircraft-testing or operational data, he would like to publish and share , he's welcome.
Kr.

 

[Marcel]

Thanks, Solved.
Looks like the hosting server is more demanding than "wamp" for the difference between small and capital letters.

If you went from a windows host to Linux, you'd be totally right.

Little problem I have on my phone is that the site does not scale correctly when opening. Might just be my iphone.

To demonstrate:

 

[bada]

Hey Neighbour!
Thanks for the feedback, i think i screwed up here when updating the css for the logo in the header, looks like i didn't change the responsive structure based on the new header structure, the logo should appear above the title, not next to it. This makes the whole page wider than it should be.
Will take a look at this in the coming days.

Do not hesitate to provide examples of what is buggy on the phones/tablets.
ps: some pages are too wide to correctly appear in the vertical view of the phones due to the very wide tables present on those pages.

 

[Marcel]

Hey Neighbour!
Thanks for the feedback, i think i screwed up here when updating the css for the logo in the header, looks like i didn't change the responsive structure based on the new header structure, the logo should appear above the title, not next to it. This makes the whole page wider than it should be.
Will take a look at this in the coming days.

Do not hesitate to provide examples of what is buggy on the phones/tablets.
ps: some pages are too wide to correctly appear in the vertical view of the phones due to the very wide tables present on those pages.

Yeah, common mistake, I've done that all the time.

For the tables you have multiple solutions. Simplest is putting the table inside a div and set overflow-x to auto. It's not the prettiest solution, but it works.

Good luck with your work. I'm also still busy.
This summer I converted Welcome | War Over Holland to a new cms and a totally new design.

 

[bada]

Some CSS corrections and added a new page, retransciption from Sport Aviation Magazine June 1990, Ending the Argument.
Private Evaluation fo the main american fighters, not in the max perf-domain , but mostly about the flying qualities.
I found it very interesting personnaly.

 

[SaparotRob]

Some CSS corrections and added a new page, retransciption from Sport Aviation Magazine June 1990, Ending the Argument.
Private Evaluation fo the main american fighters, not in the max perf-domain , but mostly about the flying qualities.
I found it very interesting personnaly.

I will confess to kind of "speed reading" through the graphs, it was both informative and entertaining. This is what I'm mostly interested in about these aircraft. Which plane would a pilot choose if he had to do a ferry flight. Which plane was a joy to fly and which would a pilot shoot himself in the foot rather than fly it. Somewhat surprised by some of the results. I would have thought, based on decades of no research at all, that the Hellcat was the easiest to fly.

 

[Marcel]

Some CSS corrections and added a new page, retransciption from Sport Aviation Magazine June 1990, Ending the Argument.
Private Evaluation fo the main american fighters, not in the max perf-domain , but mostly about the flying qualities.
I found it very interesting personnaly.

I still have the problem that the page opens zoomed-in on my iphone. If I zoom out by pinching, it snaps into place.

Edit, it mainly does that on this sport aviation magazine page and not on the home page anymore.

 

[bada]

I still have the problem that the page opens zoomed-in on my iphone. If I zoom out by pinching, it snaps into place.

Edit, it mainly does that on this sport aviation magazine page and not on the home page anymore.

One Problem at a time, i resolved the issue with the rebuild wwiiperformance main page , this one is showing as it should now., next is the main css of content pages. to be honest, slightly fed up for now, after several months working on it. So i take my time and only work on it when "i feel it".

 

[Marcel]

One Problem at a time, i resolved the issue with the rebuild wwiiperformance main page , this one is showing as it should now., next is the main css of content pages. to be honest, slightly fed up for now, after several months working on it. So i take my time and only work on it when "i feel it".

Sure, this is just in the spirit of "report problems when you see it". It's not a major breaking problem at all, so no high priority.

Other pages show up fine.

 

[bada]

Sure, this is just in the spirit of "report problems when you see it". It's not a major breaking problem at all, so no high priority.

Other pages show up fine.

Thanks Marcel, it's already on the list of "to correct" with few other things (since the day you told me about the wwiiperformance" page), just not having much "inclination" do it right now. Especially i already changed stuff but it didn't resolve the issue, so got to dig deeper.

 

[Marcel]

Thanks Marcel, it's already on the list of "to correct" with few other things (since the day you told me about the wwiiperformance" page), just not having much "inclination" do it right now. Especially i already changed stuff but it didn't resolve the issue, so got to dig deeper.

Ah, need any help?

 

[bada]

Ah, need any help?

Thank for the proposal Marcel, if you allow me to keep your proposal on reserve for now, because the website is not only a save of the original, but also a learning tool, i'll try to find the issue first by myself, well first, because i want to learn and second because i'm subborn and i like to break my head until i find the issue....or i got pissed-off and then i search help.

 

[Marcel]

Thank for the proposal Marcel, if you allow me to keep your proposal on reserve for now, because the website is not only a save of the original, but also a learning tool, i'll try to find the issue first by myself, well first, because i want to learn and second because i'm subborn and i like to break my head until i find the issue....or i got pissed-off and then i search help.

yup, I fully understand what you mean.