Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Hussars, I'm telling you straight up - you're being a *****ing @sshole and you're really pissing me off. You weren't there, you have no idea who called in the air strike from the ground and who was the FAC, American or Canadian. The US have had several friendly fire incidences where we bombed our own troops and yes its unfortunate, but its part of war and unless the FAC got his sh*t together he's going to kill his own troops and maybe himself. As time has gone on in this conflict US on US friendly fire incidences have become less and less as the learning curb flattened (It's an unfortunate way to learn, but that the facts) So until all the facts are uncovered and until it is found out who called the strike in on their position (my guess it was a Canadian FAC) I suggest you shut the f#ck up and pull your head out of your @ss.102first_hussars said:"four is a small number and we're still inflicting heavy loss on the enemy. The numbers will start to rise if we continue to tell the enemy what we're doing though."
Four is four too many,and this is becoming a routine,You think the Canadian military can afford to lose over 1000 men to the insurgents, like the americans have, no! we cant we dont have the manpower to afford that, and news hit again, the U.S military f*cked up again, 1 man has been killed and about 30 others wounded in yet another friendly fire incident, you can probably understand that i am f*cking livid right now.
plan_D said:hussars, four deaths is four deaths too many. But you cannot expect no one to be injured or die in a warzone. Four deaths in a single battle where some two-hundred of the enemy was killed is a pretty good number. My condolences to the family, but this is a war and in war people die. The Coalition has maintained a kill to loss ratio far beyond anything recorded in the past. And as long as that is kept up, the losses are acceptable.