Mar 22, 2022 #2 E Escuadrilla Azul Tech Sergeant 1,606 3,452 Feb 27, 2020 nuuumannn said: This. Might be interesting. Click to expand... I have seen it. It's interesting but, IMO, the FAA got away too lightly, when they bear a lot of responsability due the lack of supervision
nuuumannn said: This. Might be interesting. Click to expand... I have seen it. It's interesting but, IMO, the FAA got away too lightly, when they bear a lot of responsability due the lack of supervision
Mar 25, 2022 Thread starter #3 nuuumannn Major 10,149 9,444 Oct 12, 2011 Nelson Escuadrilla Azul said: I have seen it. It's interesting but, IMO, the FAA got away too lightly, when they bear a lot of responsability due the lack of supervision Click to expand... Definitely, the problem is that the FAA does stipulate that Boeing self regulates, which is dodgy, to say the least in light of what has happened. The FAA requires a good look at itself too, but that doesn't take causality away from Boeing.
Escuadrilla Azul said: I have seen it. It's interesting but, IMO, the FAA got away too lightly, when they bear a lot of responsability due the lack of supervision Click to expand... Definitely, the problem is that the FAA does stipulate that Boeing self regulates, which is dodgy, to say the least in light of what has happened. The FAA requires a good look at itself too, but that doesn't take causality away from Boeing.
Mar 26, 2022 #4 Gnomey Globetrotting Surgeon General Staff Mod 69,370 8,266 Nov 28, 2004 London / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK www.flickr.com It was certainly an interesting watch. Agree with above comments.