Oct 1, 2020 #41 E eagledad Senior Airman 319 539 Dec 23, 2006 Virginia ThomasP said: Hey eagledad, Thanks for the info. Click to expand... You are welcome Eagledad
Oct 1, 2020 Thread starter #42 S spicmart Staff Sergeant 916 196 May 11, 2008 GregP C cherry blossom Of course your reasoning could well be. When even Eric Brown had not noticed any. And the wing construction in the Fw 190 is unlike any other wing I have ever seen. Very strange, but effective. Click to expand... Can you elaborate on that?
GregP C cherry blossom Of course your reasoning could well be. When even Eric Brown had not noticed any. And the wing construction in the Fw 190 is unlike any other wing I have ever seen. Very strange, but effective. Click to expand... Can you elaborate on that?
Oct 9, 2020 #43 K K5083 Airman 1st Class 100 71 Feb 25, 2017 A P-38 at the speeds the graph requires to go to 120deg/sec would have lost elevator control and be over its allowable Mach number. Most of those fighters would be in compressibility trouble at the high IAS speeds mentioned except at low altitudes.
A P-38 at the speeds the graph requires to go to 120deg/sec would have lost elevator control and be over its allowable Mach number. Most of those fighters would be in compressibility trouble at the high IAS speeds mentioned except at low altitudes.