Aircraft production 1939-45

Discussion in 'Technical' started by R988, Jun 8, 2006.

  1. R988

    R988 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    608
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Occupation:
    Office Gimp
    Location:
    Londonium
    Found this interesting chart on aircraft production figures for all types for 1939 to 45, apparently from the WW2 Almanac or something, no idea of accuracy but they seem reasonable enough to me and seem to match what I have already heard.

    The US seriously kicked into gea, going from lowest here by far in 1939, to tripling production by 1940, then tripling again from '40 to '41, then more than doubling from '41 to '42, almost doubling again from '42 to '43, finally levelling off a bit in '44 and then backing off in '45 obviosuly as the war wound down. You can see the massive industrial might they had at the time, noone else comes close.

    US

    1939 - 2,141
    1940 - 6,086
    1941 - 19,433
    1942 - 47,836
    1943 - 85,898
    1944 - 96,318
    1945 - 46,001
    Total - 303,713

    Britain was already cranking them out in 1939 when the war officially started, almost doubling in 1940 during the Battle of Britain, but then only adding a bit each year until they pretty much topped out in 1943/44 at 26K per year, maybe this was their upper limit of production?

    Britain

    1939 - 7,940
    1940 - 15,049
    1941 - 20,094
    1942 - 23,672
    1943 - 26,263
    1944 - 26,461
    1945 - 12,070
    Total - 131,549

    The USSR was obviously preparing for a war in '39, 10K per year in 1939 is easily the most aircraft of this lot, only Germany comes close at the time. They seemed to have kept up and even increased production during the early invasion years when they were shfiting production to the urals, then they shifted gear and got into it, though never really made that many compared to the US for example. their peak production in 1944 was not even as much as Germany, though I guess they didn't need so many as they were also being given lots of aircraft via lend lease

    USSR

    1939 - 10,382
    1940 - 10,565
    1941 - 15,737
    1942 - 25,436
    1943 - 34,900
    1944 - 40,300
    1945 - 20,900
    Total - 158,220

    Germany was unsuprisingly at fairly high production (comparatively) in '39, suprisingly not increasing production all that much until the later years, you can see them creeing up quite a bit in '43 then a lot in '44, but then of course dropping off considerably in '45 for obvious reasons.

    Germany

    1939 - 8,295
    1940 - 10,826
    1941 - 12,401
    1942 - 15,409
    1943 - 24,807
    1944 - 40,593
    1945 - 7,540
    Total - 119,871

    Suprisingly Japans output is quite low, even in the first 3 years when they were quite involved in war on all fronts, even by '42 they are still at quite low production, they start pedalling harder in '43 once they realise they are starting to lose ground, then hitting full speed in '44 like Germany when they probably realise they might in fact lose, then petering out in '45 once they did lose.

    Japan

    1939 - 4,467
    1940 - 4,768
    1941 - 5,088
    1942 - 8,861
    1943 - 16,693
    1944 - 28,180
    1945 - 8,263
    Total - 76,320

    Quite interesting really, why didn't Germany or Japan increase production until the later years? Was it overconfidence in victory? or does it take until you are getting hammered and your homeland is under threat to realise you need to pull your finger out? Or was it due to mounting losses that production needed to be upped?
     
  2. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    Interesting subject.

    One thing thats scarey about the US production totals, is it doesnt include all the wastage that was prevalent in starting up production.

    In early 1945, the aircraft industry was just "warming" up and there was even more capacity available if needed.

    One big reason the US could build so many aircraft is the willingness to use woman in the labor force and there was a vast cadre of managers, engineers and technicians who understood the mass production concept, and readily applied it to area's where it was never tried before.

    Japans totals in 1945 were low because of the submarine blockade and B29 raids were destroying their capacity to build anything, let alone aircraft.
     
  3. Hop

    Hop Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    624
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    18
    To a certain extent it reflects a change in aircraft types. More heavy bombers in 1944 than 1943. The weight of aircraft produced increased, from 185 million pounds to 208 million.

    The production totals from the British Bombing Survey Unit, in million pounds of airframe weight:

    US
    1941 - 81.36
    1942 - 275.83
    1943 - 654.19
    1944 - 961.12

    UK
    1941 - 87.25
    1942 - 133.38
    1943 - 185.25
    1944 - 208.47

    Germany
    1941 - 64.43
    1942 - 91.72
    1943 - 139.90
    1944 - 173.66
     
  4. Glider

    Glider Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Consellor
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    This is very interesting. The one that surprised me were the figures for the USSR. I always had them down as producing vast numbers of relatively basic aircraft. To find their numbers in the same basic ballpark as the UK wasn't what I expected.
     
  5. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Well one thing this really shows is the capacity that the US had compared to other nations. As for Germany I would say it is because of overconfidence and also a bit of reaching there industrial capacity. I agree with syscom about the Japanese figures.
     
  6. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    Can anyone imagine the US figures if by 1945, the Willow Run production concept was used for ALL aircraft types?
     
  7. Jabberwocky

    Jabberwocky Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Japan
    Its interesting to see just how the change in focus to single seat fighters allowed German and Japan to massively increase aircraft production.

    As far as I can see, there are a few factors behind the decision:

    1. Their offensive arms were now fairly impotent in the face of Allied air power,

    2. They were desperately trying to regain control of thier own airspace and damage/defeat Allied bombing efforts

    3. The capacity of the single seat fighter as a tactical weapon had grown immensly since 1939, particularly as a fighter-bomber.
     
  8. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    The main reason was to try and stop the allied bombing offensive. Germany however did not completely give up the production of larger multi engine aircraft because Hitler was so damn hell bent on bombing the enemy back.
     
  9. pbfoot

    pbfoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    niagara falls
    I looked at those numbers and was surprised that Canada out did the Italians:shock: by a substanial amount
     
  10. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    They werent getting bombed and attacked day and night.
     
  11. pbfoot

    pbfoot Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2005
    Messages:
    7,636
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    niagara falls
    and there was only 11 million of us
     
  12. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
  13. ricardox

    ricardox New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    i know this is off the subject but did the ussr outproduce the us in tank production they rally had a lot of t34's rolling around
     
  14. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    The USSR only survived because of Lend Lease from the US.
     
  15. Twitch

    Twitch Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2006
    Messages:
    809
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Occupation:
    historical combat aviation writer
    Location:
    City of the Angels California
    Hmm, yeah? What are tank productions numbers for the countries? All those "Free" 1 1/2 and duece and a half trucks we sent allowed them to concentrate on T-34s instead. [​IMG]
     
  16. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    I agree and that is what I am basically getting at.
     
  17. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    The T-34 was the most produced Tank of WW2. I believe it is the 2nd most produced tank of all time, but I am not sure on that.

    Between 1940 and 1945 there were 57,339 T-34s built in Russia. Including these tanks built during WW2 and the ones built by the Russians and other countries after WW2 until the 1950's there were about 84,070 T-34s built all together.

    The Russians used the T-34s until the 1960s in there reserves and the T-34 was used in Vietnam including the attack on Lang Vei. T-34s were used in Vietnam and even the Iraqi Army had T-34s during Desert Storm.
     
  18. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    US Tank production didnt really begin untill well into 1942.

    If you look at the strength of the US Army in 1941 and what it was equipped with, it was pathetic and laughable.
     
  19. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,767
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    The Shermans could have been produced just as quickly for the US like the T-34 was for the Russians. The Sherman was easily mass produced and because of its simplicity is the only reason I think they kept building it rather than try to build bigger and better tanks. The object was to build something that got the job done and win the war.

    Anyhow this needs to get back on topic.
     
  20. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    I wonder if this was true.

    Goering (or Speer maybe?) was quoted as saying that the US could build razors and washing machines, but not airplanes.
     
Loading...

Share This Page