Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Your right, its a race to repair the equipment and the men, retrain learning the lessons of the recent conflict and reconstitute the units. On this I am a little hopeful as the vast majority of the people in Ukraine want to defend their homeland, and the majority of the Russian forces (and their allies) don't want to be there
Maybe, just maybe this is one where the Ukraine have a slight advantage. The average quality of the new equipment Ukraine is getting is at least as good and often better than what they had originally. Whereas the average quality of the equipment the Russian forces are getting is worse than they originally had. Russia still has a very significant numerical advantage, but that advantage seems to be getting slowly eroded
Totally agree. It's something that I have been banging on about since the start of this conflict.
I kept these together as in Training and Planning, these are two areas where the Ukraine does seem to have a firm advantage. If they had fought the way they had been trained prior to 2014 they this conflict could easily have been over by now. We have seen ordinary civilian workers manning Tanks and other complex weapons with aplomb and self evident success.
Russian planning at both strategic and tactical levels has been shocking, and training would need a serious amount of rebuilding from the ground up.
Ukraine worked hard from 2014 on listening to US, Canadian and UK advisors and made a fundamental shift in their planning and training. Who are Russian going to turn to for advice and would they listen anyway?
Has it been corroborated?
For those who can access The Times
Ukraine has one million ready for fightback to recapture south
Ukraine is massing a million-strong fighting force equipped with western weapons to recover its southern territory from Russia, the nation’s defence minister hwww.thetimes.co.uk
Seems like Ukrinians favor retaking the south over the Donbas
This is the Germany I respect.
Really? All of it? What do you disagree with specifically?Had to disagree with anything he said.
Major Typo now correctedReally? All of it? What do you disagree with specifically?
It took them more than three months to cross a river against a "fictitious" country that's begging for ammo.
It took them more than three months to cross a river against a "fictitious" country that's begging for ammo.
They lost 3 large ships in a land war.
Their aircraft carrier was put out of commission by its own dry dock.
How they gonna' cross the Bering Straight against unusually heavily armed (even for America) Americans?