Alternate Approach to the P-38 Compressibility Problem

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Actually Greg, with tricycle landing gear, the inward turning prop created 'downflow' over the center section of the wing - which reduced relative angle of attack. Required abnormally high takeoff speeds to get required CL.

The P-82 as a tail dragger had the opposite problem with outward turning prop creating an upflow over center section and an artificially high AoA on takeoff which stalled the center section.
 
I don't believe a word of the account.

Cutting one engine on a P-38 in a dive would have two specific and immediate results - 1.) major reduction in thrust with accompanying increase drag due to the prop, creating major and dangerous yaw input, 2.) major reduction in local airspeed over dead engine inboard wing section.

IMO the result would be to slow down enough to transition the P-38 below critical mach - and restore both elevator authority and 'normal' pitch moment of the wings. Pilot would still be jamming the rudder to reduce dangerous yaw condition.

In the interim, the German fighter, already faster in a dive, is Not slowing up and waving bye-bye.
 
One of the dumber things about the video is how it it talks about the elevator being locked in place by the shock waves. That was more or less the thinking in 1942. In reality the approach to mach 1 at altitude led to an aft movement of the pressure on the wing, leading to the elevator being not locked but not effective enough. The "dive flaps" moved the center of pressure forward. Seeing a modern day "documentary" that uses that kind of "locked elevator" explanation is like hearing a medical doctor of today blaming evil spirits for disease.

If you were transported back to 1942 and tried to explain to Lockheed what was really going on I am not sure they would believe you or even understand you. So little was known about transonic flow then. It took the Bell X-1 to discover the importance of an adjustable horizontal stabilizer, even though such things had been used for decades back in the biplane era.
 

Users who are viewing this thread