Such a maneuver makes sense if Fritz X can be guided during it. Can it be guided at this speed and with the climb when the target is moving faster (compared to piston engine carrier) in the sight scope and there is no second crew member to do that? I assume that without the manual tracking and guiding procedure Fritz X is unlikely to be more precise than a free-fall bomb.
The Arado 234C had two noteworthy differences over the Ar 234B. Firstly it had an enlarged and now pressurised cabin, slightly raised in a bubble to give some rearward visibility, that could carry a second crew member though not all versions were to actually do this. The two man Ar 234 never entered service but the Ar 234C3 did enter service and this had the new cockpit that had enough room. This second crew member would be the bomb aimer. The other modification was that the 2 x Jumo 004 engines were replaced with 4 x BMW 003 thereby greatly increasing speed. In clean form it could exceed its own Mach limit in level flight. This meant it could haul its bombs at Mach 0.8 which was the Mach limit of all jets such as the P80, Me 262, Meteor III/IV.
The bombs would take about 35 seconds to fall, the bomber would need to slow down after release for about 35 seconds and it did this with a steep climb to make sure that it lined up with the bombs and targets line of sight during the last 5 seconds or so when guidance took place and the error could be seen.
The Lofte 7 bomb sight was very accurate. When Fw 200 using Lotfe 7 attacked Convoy Faith they got around 50% direct hits from an altitude of between 14,000 to 16,000ft. Most the merchant ships they targeted were hit all of the destroyers, frigates and sloops were able to use their speed, acceleration and manoeuvrability to dodge the bombs which usually splashed 100 yards away. Hence the problem in hitting a ship was not the accuracy of the bombs but I the manouverability of the warship.
Fritz-X was able to consistently hit a target within a radius of 6 meters. It was very accurate. The bomb aimer was observing the bomb and target through the magnifcation of the Lofte bomb sight, the bombsights tracking computer was keeping the target cantered, so in the last few seconds the divegence of the bomb from target would be aparent and it could be nudged to overcome the evasions of the target or make correction.
There was an infrared homer, I think "Hamburg" was its name but there is nothing to stop the MAX-P passive homer developed for the Wasserfall SAM to attack H2S equiped bombers and Mosquito nigh fighters or the Radischien system developed to target longer wave radars and LORAN or even the Tonne-Seedorf TV system developed for the HS-293 missile.
Alternative jam resistant guidance systems had been developed.