cheddar cheese
Major General
How? It probably could have been.
Best Bomber
- Thread starter horseUSA
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
- Status
A
Anonymous
Guest
cheddar cheese said:
Well, it could certainly have been a better bomber than anything they had. Hiter's requirement that all bombers be dive bombers was a huge blunder.
=S=
Lunatic
GermansRGeniuses
Tech Sergeant
Nah....
That title definetly belongs to its son, the B-29 Superfortress!
That title definetly belongs to its son, the B-29 Superfortress!
cheddar cheese
Major General
Indeed it does!
DaveB.inVa
Airman 1st Class
- 225
- Dec 20, 2004
I know this is an old poll but I do cast my vote for the B-29. Besides being my favorite aircraft of all time, I believe it also was the best bomber of the war. It had good range, speed, altitude, bombload and armament, plus pressurization. Others indeed had a mix of these features but never had all of them in one package.
A
Anonymous
Guest
DaveB.inVa said:
Pressurization was a mixed blessing. If they expected they might get into combat, they'd depressurize the cabin. Sometimes they didn't, and we hear stories of 1 meter holes being blown in the skins of B-29's as a result!
=S=
Lunatic
PS: I agree, the B-29 was the best heavy bomber of WWII.
DaveB.inVa
Airman 1st Class
- 225
- Dec 20, 2004
Most times Ive read of and talked with vets they only were pressurized when not over target. However like you said some chose to ignore the possiblity of an explosive decompression. One veteran I talked to said that they didn't depressurize during the run and were hit producing a hole right above the guys head in the forward compartment. He said to plug the hole he threw his gloves up and they were caught in the hole!! He also said they're were a few other holes and these were plugged by putting small pieces of cardboard over the hole and the pressure differential would hold them there.
On an interesting note did you know the B-29B was equipped with more than tail guns. The B model was basically a stripped bomber with only the tail turret remaining, all sighting blisters were faired over. However in the rear pressurized area there was a provision for firing flexible hand held .50 caliber machine guns out of the sighting blister holes. I dont know much more about it though except that it was a provision, Ive never read if it was used or if the extra .50s were even carried!
On an interesting note did you know the B-29B was equipped with more than tail guns. The B model was basically a stripped bomber with only the tail turret remaining, all sighting blisters were faired over. However in the rear pressurized area there was a provision for firing flexible hand held .50 caliber machine guns out of the sighting blister holes. I dont know much more about it though except that it was a provision, Ive never read if it was used or if the extra .50s were even carried!
cheddar cheese
Major General
Me neither. Perhaps if it had more armour and guns...
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
and loose the manouverability that saved it from so many NFs?? just out of interest how many B-17s were shot down during the war??
cheddar cheese
Major General
Lots...but there were more of them.
Devin Dilley
Recruit
- 7
- Mar 18, 2005
hey the B-29 rocks and all but you have to look at other countries because germany was close behind in building a good bomber
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
well not really
Devin Dilley
Recruit
- 7
- Mar 18, 2005
If the Lancaster had better handling qualities ................and a better armour i would fly it. In other words screw the lancaster cuz the b-29 is better
the lancaster kicks ass
Major General
- 19,937
- Dec 20, 2003
hey the lanc was the most manouverable four engined heavy out there.........
Concorde247
Senior Airman
Devin Dilley said:
All of the Germans bombers were short range, unless you were referring to that great toaster of the skies called the He 177 Greif. Very handy if you wanted to make toast - just give the engine ONE second to warm up!!
Concorde247
Senior Airman
Mosin said:
I think that It certainly was the best twin engined Bomber the Germans had, and was also an effective nightfighter. But due to the Lancasters range bombload the Lanc still does it for me!
Concorde247
Senior Airman
the lancaster kicks ass said:
EXACTLY!! I Never heard of a B17 doing a corkscrew Manouevre before.
Many Lancaster veterans said that the Lanc handled more like a fighter it was very responsive on the controls. The only thing the B17 could do was stay in its tight combat wing formations for the combined firepower of all the ships together!!
- Status
![](data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,<svg height="16px" width="16px" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1"/>)