Germany was egoistic with their hardware, we very well know that. It's a constant in this context, not a variable.
100% agree, for 1933-45 at least
Never said 'annihilate factories'None of the German bombers was able to annihilate factories. Even the Allied 1943-44 campaign, a scale that Germany would've never been able to achieve in 1941, wasn't able to do that.
The bomber raids on railway junctions bridges would've made relocation difficult. But, if your bombers are acting as artillery (since the guns you have are mostly horse-drawn), you already have small density per square mile of enemy terrain (that of interest), guess such raids were not possible.
If Germany had had the possibility to evacuate those sites they could've easily done so.
They did not have the extra space for relocation in 1944 - whenever relocated, it would've been within reach of bombers, plus the production loss in the crucial time would've been huge.
Your assumption they would've suffered less losses with more planes is just that, an assumption.
Not really, you might want to check out what USAAF RAF were doing with their assets, as early as 1942. And Luftwaffe was all about that from the day one - use the planes to break up enemy assets, so those will not be able to fire back on ground forces.
Even with the airforce as large as it was they had problems with logistics and field space.
German top brass (Hitler as a prime example), liked to put aside the long-term planing, since the prospects were bleak in that light, way before 1940
Last edited: