Verdammt, die Luftwaffe hat ihre Chance wieder vertan....
View attachment 781126
Wrong black crossses… tsk tsk tsk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Verdammt, die Luftwaffe hat ihre Chance wieder vertan....
View attachment 781126
Those are actually the older black crosses.They are the newer, nicer, friendlier black crosses so as to not worry the neighbors.
But they don't provide the speed advantage of the Balkan Cross.But, old is new again. That's why they are the newer, nicer, etc.
They are the newer, nicer, friendlier black crosses so as to not worry the neighbors.
The term "Balkan Cross" has become the familiar English language term for the "black beam cross of Saint Michael of the Teutonic Order used by Prussia and Germany".Pedant hat on, it's Balkenkreuz not Balkan.
Indeed.From what I've read, the MiG 23/27 were dogs,
Any improvements to the MiG-23 will compete with the production of the MiG-29 for electronic warfare equipment or a helmet-mounted optical guidance system. For the USSR, any effort to improve the MiG-23 with the MiG-29 in service is just a waste of money. The entire MiG-23 program was initially unrealistic. Huge efforts were invested in mastering technologies, which as a result turned out to be unused. Perhaps the E-8 was a more reasonable way of fighter evolution. But the USSR had its own laws of "unnatural selection".Well, that's where we must begin then, to make a better MiG-23. Start with the MiG-23MLD and proposed upgrades.