Best tank killer aircraft of WW2

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Hans Ulrich Rudel, the Stuka pilot who was
Nazi Germany's most-decorated soldier.
In 2,530 combat missions flying dive-bombers,
mainly on the Russian front, Rudel was credited with
destroying 519 tanks, 150 gun emplacements and 800
combat vehicles of various types.
According to Luftwaffe records, he also damaged
or destroyed three large warships and 70 smaller
craft. For this he was awarded the "Golden Oakleaf
with Sword and Diamonds to the Knight's cross of the
Iron Cross." He was the only German soldier to
receive that award in World War II.

Stuka gets my vote ..IL2 was a good plane but is overated -do a search on the tank battle at Kursk and see how many tanks were destroyed by Stukas vs IL2s ..funny how you only hear lots about the IL2 since the game came out a few years ago p51 is definitely not up there as a tankbuster...Typhoon /Tempest and the Hurri in the desert are all good.
 
Some pictures about Rudel are here attached.



His record



His Aircraft













Interestingly he also flew the FW 190 D9





His medals



His records


Source: http://www.pilotenbunker.de/Stuka/Rudel/rudel.htm

Kiwimac
 
Thanks for the pics Kiwi ..i have actually been skinning Rudels D9 for EAW over the last two weeks and i havent been able to find that black and white pic ..apparently its pretty rare ..so cheers 8)

This is about halfway through(heaps of work to go yet) and its with the 98 default terrain so it looks pretty crappy
 

Attachments

  • scrn00.jpg
    78.3 KB · Views: 1,201
I think the reason Stukas always put you off C.C is that they're ugly and very very very easy to shoot down - Hurricanes and Spitfires made mincemeat of them during the Battle of Britain
 
Not speed, armour or manourvarability...i must say its hard to think of much it did have to its advantage...apart from a really scary sound when it dive-bombed hapless civilians maybe?

anyway lanc i would expect you to think the stuka wasn't bad looking - you think the lancaster is a piece of art...
 
Well, actually

The Stuka was, surprise, surprise, a damn fine DIVE-BOMBER. The German's mistake was to believe that ANY dive-bomber could protect itself against fighters without some kind of cover.

Interestingly the Japanese made the same discovery with the Aichi 'Val'

Kiwimac
 
Yes the Stuka was a fine dive-bomber....as long as there wasn't any of the following in the immediate vacinity...

A) An enemy fighter
B) Anti-aircraft guns
C) A soldier with a rifle
D) A soldier with a pistol
E) A child with a peashooter
F) An OAP with a really dirty look on their face

because any one of the above could have crippled a Stuka with one fell swoop because lets face it....a plane thats easy to shoot down during wartime...is not much good at all - even if it can cause alot of damage given the oppurtunity....like clear skies for 100miles!

Sad but very very true
 
And yet, Whaler, there is Rudel whose 'score' seems to give the lie to your statement. Could it be that in the hands of a superior pilot even a very ordinary machine can become more than its makers concieved?

indeed...but if you guys are looking for the best tank killer of the war ... and not a fighter- i really think the Stuka is it. A tank killer would normally operate under a fighter escort cover anyway as its role is ground attack and not fighter to fighter engagement. As i said before the IL2 was ok as was the p47 and Typhoons in ground attack BUT the stuka was conceived way before any of these as primarily a ground attack weapon and performed perfectly in this role...and lasted the whole war still getting kills in the hands of novices as late as April 1945.
 

Users who are viewing this thread