Best WW2 Fighter Pilot Poll Round 2
- Thread starter DerAdlerIstGelandet
- Start date
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
*SkyChimp*
Airman
- 36
- Jan 7, 2018
I was speaking principally about the use of fighters as fighter-bombers used in support of ground forces. There's no way the Germans had the capacity to do that to the extent of the Allies. But as far as I know, the Germans didn't do it at all in North Africa. Maybe some isolated occurrences, admittedly. But nothing like any sort of real effort.
Well, the Allies used their principal types in North Africa, the Hurricane and P-40s, as fighter bombers. Whether or not Marseilles knew the capacity in which they were flying when he attacked them is unknown to me. The point is, however, that Marseilles was more interested in fighters than bombers. That's reflected in his kill claims. Especially considering the large quantity of British bombers present that could have been targeted. The history of the Allied air war in North Africa is replete with accounts of bomber attacks on German troops with out any German fighter opposition. JG27 certainly had the opportunity to target bombers but they didn't. It is, without questions, one of the greatest blunders of the German military during the campaign in North Africa.
I'm certainly not the first to proffer this position. JG27's military contribution to the campaign in North Africa was negligible. British bombers did emense damage to German ground forces and JG27 did very little to stop them. Not because they couldn't, but rather because their priorities were wrong. Pilot rivalry, unit rivalry, glory-seeking, etc. Marseilles was a glory-hound. Even if all his claims were true (and they aren't), the effect on the British air campaign was next to nothing. The proper use of fighters under these circumstances is to prevent the enemy from destroying your ground troops (by destroying bombers), and by destroying enemy ground troops (by use as fighter bombers).
No doubt the Lw made many mistakes in North Africa; whether or not the issues you outline are as clear-cut, I'm not sure.
As to Marseilles; whether he could or should have shot down more bombers; or him being a glory hunter, well that's certainly possible. It's sure that he overclaimed, but that doesn't really make him stand out from the crowd. He did have the ability to manouvre his fighter into a position where he could shoot at and hit enemy aircraft, which was not a trait shared by most WWII fighter pilots. Any Hurricane or P-40 he shot down, was not coming back the next day to bomb or strafe Axis ground troops.
As to Marseilles; whether he could or should have shot down more bombers; or him being a glory hunter, well that's certainly possible. It's sure that he overclaimed, but that doesn't really make him stand out from the crowd. He did have the ability to manouvre his fighter into a position where he could shoot at and hit enemy aircraft, which was not a trait shared by most WWII fighter pilots. Any Hurricane or P-40 he shot down, was not coming back the next day to bomb or strafe Axis ground troops.
Hansie Bloeckmann
Senior Airman
He was, and will always be, my top pick of all the Luftwaffe pilots--
*SkyChimp*
Airman
- 36
- Jan 7, 2018
There's no question that their was military value in shooting down fighters-bombers. They did an immense amount of damage. But Hans-Joachim Marseille and JG27 did little to stop bombers, concentrating on fighters instead. Bombers, by and large, attacked German troops with impunity.
In North Africa, the Luftwaffe failed in several ways. Among them, and mainly for lack of trying, the failure to blunt the British bomber offensive against their ground troops. And also by failing to supplement their own dedicated ground attack aircraft with fighters equipped for ground attack.
