Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Perhaps in the sense that it was a political exercise meant to demonstrate that anything the West could do, the Soviets could do too. Same with their B 29, no doubt, though that was a true case of reverse engineering and they would have picked up valuable insights into production processes, etc.
I understand the USSR did try to pinch the design of the Concorde, but were fed disinformation. Doubtless someone out there is more across that piece of history than me.
Even the Americans could take 1 1/2 to 2 years to set up a factory and getting it turning out large numbers of engines starting from a bare plot of ground BUT starting WITH the help of a complete set of blueprints of the engine, Some parts supplied by outside vendors (laready making parts for parent company) AND the help of some engineers from the parent factory/s.
There are two stories on the engines for the Russian TU-4, one is that they copied the engines in teh B-29 and the other is that they used their own engines in it, only part/s not copied.
But since their own engine was a 2 row 18 cylinder developed of a licence built 9 cylinder 1 row Wright Cyclone and the R-3350 was a Wright developed 2 row 18 cylinder version of the 9 cylinder 1 row Wright Cyclone the practical difference is vary small.
The Russian 2 row 18 cylinder engine was the 4th attempt at such an 18 cylinder engine by the same design team and the 9 cylinder Licence built engines had already been "Metricized".
Im surprised to see the claim that the Soviets were caught off guard, so to speak, by the size of the fittings and production techniques in the B-29. If thre was one thing the Soviets could do, and still do, its build big things. They are good at it. Including big airframes and associated technologies.
Britain built the Mosquito out of wood because they didn't produce much aluminum.
...
WE also have to remember that prior to WW2 Soviet Russia was a backward country whose primary industry, agriculture, still used horses and human power for years after the West mechanised. Much of its population lived without electricity and running water and literacy was low. Barbarossa did a huge amount of damage to infrastructure in the western Soviet Union; during the Soviet occupation of eastern Germany, whole power stations and factories were dismantled and sent back East. I can vaguely remember that one of the hangars at Monino had "Rauchen Verboten" painted on the walls years ago.
This is a myth, the Soviet Russia being such a backward country prior ww2?