Corsair and Hellcat vs Bf 109 and Fw 190

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

I'm curious if the dive-speeds for the F6F were remotely accurate: I'm surprised it would dive faster than the F4U

The outer wing panels on the F4U were partially fabric covered and the ailerons were of wood construction.

Eric Brown, who spent a lot of time flying the FW-190 as well as some time flying the F4U assessed the F4U as significantly inferior to the FW-190 in a dogfight. Against this is the assessment of the USN pilot who flew the FW-190 at Pax RIver and concluded "It is not a dogfighter." He thought it was best at boom and zoom.
 
The outer wing panels on the F4U were partially fabric covered and the ailerons were of wood construction.
I think the F4U-5 was the first to be all-metal (except the tires, the canopy, and parts that aren't, well, metal).
Eric Brown, who spent a lot of time flying the FW-190 as well as some time flying the F4U assessed the F4U as significantly inferior to the FW-190 in a dogfight.
That is a surprise, I would have thought one of the few areas of advantage the F4U would have had would've been rate of turn (which is generally a classic dogfight), combined with maneuvering flaps.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back