Corsairs from best to worst

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Fangjay

Recruit
4
0
Mar 4, 2021
Actually, i think all Corsairs are great, but in your opinion, rate the the Corsair variants from best-average-worst. Would love to read ur opinions.
 
I honestly think the F4U-5N is the best though. It had better performance than its predecessors and was modernised. My worst would be the AU-1, maybe because it was heavy and lacked performance, but still a great attack aircraft 😄
 
They started off short, droppy wing and bouncy, so I think short silver droppy wing and bouncy ones were the worst, whilst long blue floaty ones that didn't bounce were the best (if they had roundels of course).

Corsair, Corsair, Corsair

Silver
Vought_SU-3_(4526389315).jpg

Vought O2U Corsair

White/Gray
1200px-A-7E_Corsair_II_of_VA-146_in_flight_on_16_November_1974_(NNAM.1996.253.7100.039).jpg

LTV A-7 Corsair II - Wikipedia

Blue
F4U-1_Corsair_in_flight_c1942.jpg

Vought F4U Corsair
 
My worst would be the AU-1,

Be very careful when comparing the AU-1, granted it wasn't anywhere near as good high up but many websites and books give the top speed with it carrying a pair of large bombs, 10 small bombs and a drop tank, all at the same time.
Performance when clean at low altitude was actually pretty good.
361mph at sea level and 389mph at 14,000ft.
Climb at sea level using combat power (115/145 fuel) was 4620fps.

See http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/AU-1_Corsair_SAC_-_1_June_1953.pdf
 
I honestly think the F4U-5N is the best though. It had better performance than its predecessors and was modernised. My worst would be the AU-1, maybe because it was heavy and lacked performance, but still a great attack aircraft 😄
The British only had two basic methods of improving performance, hack off or add to the ends of the wings and increase the distance between the pilot and the propeller. This also seems to have worked on the Corsair.
 
Be very careful when comparing the AU-1, granted it wasn't anywhere near as good high up but many websites and books give the top speed with it carrying a pair of large bombs, 10 small bombs and a drop tank, all at the same time.
Performance when clean at low altitude was actually pretty good.
361mph at sea level and 389mph at 14,000ft.
Climb at sea level using combat power (115/145 fuel) was 4620fps.

See http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/AU-1_Corsair_SAC_-_1_June_1953.pdf
True that... i would say it was also pretty sturdy and tough the AU-1. What about the F2G though? I don't know much about it but i heard it was rather mediocre.
 
Last edited:
I agree. I wonder why some Corsairs remained in their USN blue whilst others were painted FAA camouflage. This pic claims to be at the US Brewster factory, suggesting that this plant at least painted the Corsair camo prior to delivery.

View attachment 615075

View attachment 615076
Did it depend on theatre, I think its sensible for RN Corsairs to be in the same colours as US ones when working together.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back