Thumpalumpacus
Colonel
The P-38 was also simply more expensive per unit, and required more training due to two engines. Great airplane all the same.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Dear lord.The British versus American fuel issue (0% aromatics versus 2%T aromatics) was present at the start of US involvement in the war. It took nine months to fix and only got discovered when a sample of British fuel was sent back to Allison so the issue could be replicated on the test stands. It wasn't an issue very long after it was discovered and was easy to rectify, but it DID exiust at the time the P-38s went to North Africa.
based on all that, I would make the following observations (just my opinions / interpretation):
The worst single day of Axis losses was about 30-40 aircraft destroyed on the ground by a big medium and heavy bomber raid on 22 Jan, though most of the aircraft destroyed were bombers and transports. About 12 Bf 109s were also destroyed or heavily damaged by bombs during this raid.
- All of the Allied fighter units in Western North Africa were having trouble at this point
- A lot of the really one sided massacres were at the hands of the Fw 190s of JG 2 which were (as far as I know) new to the Theater around this time
- Allied units sometimes misidentified these as Bf 109s, which could be a fatal mistake
- The Italians were not playing as much of a role at this point as they had in 1942 and would later again in 1943.
- Even this early though, P-38s were sometimes holding their own with the Bf 109s, or close to it
- (this may have something to do with the arrival of the P-38G which had a bit more HP?)
- Heavy bombers (B-17s and B-24s) were sometimes flying raids without escorts and not being too badly shot up in spite of it
- US light and medium bombers (A-20, B-25, B-26) were holding up better to fighter attack in general than the German ones
- In fact already at this stage the Ju 88s in particular were already suffering unsustainable losses IMO
The SAS raid on Sidi Haneish Airfield (26–27 July 1942) with MGs armed jeeps accounted for a tally of 37 planes destroyed on te ground.
That was right exactly when that particular issue was solved, never to reappear again.Dear lord.
There is possibly a misunderstanding in play here.That was right exactly when that particular issue was solved, never to reappear again.
Hard to bebunk facts, Tomo. The issue was documented, and I've seen correspondence about it on Allison and US government paper. Again, it was not an issue for long, and never reappeared later. Once we were all using the same fuel formula, the "problem" went away. Total time for the entire issue was maybe 6 - 8 months, early in the war, when relatively few US aircraft were flying combat, so it wasn't exactly a calamity. It DID help give rise to the "Allison Time Bomb" monicker, when the fuel combined with the intake issue resulted in blown engines, particularly at high altutide after a long cold soak. Also relatively documented, if only in stores from early P-38 pilots blowing engines.There is possibly a misunderstanding in play here.
Namely, I've disagreed with your 'British fuel' story, that was debunked numerous times here.
IMHO, the P-38's two main deficiencies in combat were:
1. Very poor roll rate
As Col Royal D. Frey, who flew P-38s with the 20th FG from England, recalled:Although the P-38 could turn very tightly once it got into a bank, getting it into a bank was another matter. Late J series and L series Lightnings had aileron boost, but this feature came too late for those few of us who took on the Luftwaffe deep inside Germany in those grim days of late 1943 and early 1944. Because of the weight of the plane and the poor leverage of a control wheel compared to that of a control stick, the plane's roll rate approximated that of a pregnant whale. If we ever got behind a single-engined fighter in a tight turn, all the other pilot had to do was flip into an opposite turn and dive; by the time we had banked and turned after him, he was practically out of sight. [p16]2. The Luftwaffe pilot's ability to break off combat at will
Thirty-nine-victory ace Leutnant Johann Pichler, a Bf 109 pilot who flew over North Africa with 7./JG 77 in 1942–43 and who claimed two P-38s in aerial combat, found that:. . . an excellent means of breaking off combat was to go into a power dive from high altitude. The P-38 pilots rarely followed us. At first we could not understand this, but the mystery was explained a few months later when a captured P-38 pilot told us that in a dive, the aircraft became too fast to be pulled out safely. [p15]Quotes from "P-38 LIGHTNING vs Bf 109 North Africa, Sicily and Italy 1942–43", Edward M. Young
Of note is that the book also shows that the Luftwaffe's Bf 109 pilots established a victory-to-loss ratio of nearly three P-38s for every Bf 109 lost in combat.
It can't have been all that bad since it was the mount of our two top fighter aces of the war. Three of the top 10 US aces flew P-38s.
P-38 - Three of top ten.
F6F - One of top ten.
P-47 - Two of top ten.
P-51 - One of top ten.
F4U - Two or top ten. Boyington flew bnoth the P-40 and F4U in his vidtory list, so even the P-40 is mentioned.
F4F - One of top ten.
The P-38 shows up more than any other US fighter in the top ten US aces. How bad could it have been? Really.
Heavy roll forces were overcome by hydraulic ailerons from the P-38J-25-+LO forward. aking the P-38 opne of the best rollers of US fighters after that model came out.
There was no P-38 flying operationally in Europe early in the war.Hard to bebunk facts, Tomo. The issue was documented, and I've seen correspondence about it on Allison and US government paper. Again, it was not an issue for long, and never reappeared later. Once we were all using the same fuel formula, the "problem" went away. Total time for the entire issue was maybe 6 - 8 months, early in the war, when relatively few US aircraft were flying combat, so it wasn't exactly a calamity. It DID help give rise to the "Allison Time Bomb" monicker, when the fuel combined with the intake issue resulted in blown engines, particularly at high altutide after a long cold soak. Also relatively documented, if only in stores from early P-38 pilots blowing engines.
Well, here's something to read attached. Note the end where the fightrers being compared have data. The P-38J with hydraulic boost is the fastest roller, by far. The other 3 were the P-47, P-51B, and P-80A. Not bad company. It ALSO had the samllest turn radius of the four fighters compared.
Not too shabby. Goes a long way to correcting some misconceptions about twins not performing like singles, doesn't it?