Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Let's hear it for Pratt & Whitney's bulletproof J-57! GE's J-79 in the RF-4 and RA-5 was more powerful and fuel efficient, but not as robust, reliable, or smooth. In the RA-5, the vibration issue was somewhat alleviated by mounting the cameras in a streamlined dugout-like pod mounted under the belly, leaving the tubular bomb bay between the engines available for additional fuel canisters. Egressing Laos to Yankee Station in the weeds at Mach++ takes a lot of gas!the best cameras in both airplanes were the vertical ones in the back, between the engines. And the RF-4C's cameras back there had a problem with engine vibration. The RF-101C's had no such problem and thus got better pictures.