FAA orders replacement of Airbus airspeed sensors

Discussion in 'Modern' started by syscom3, Sep 3, 2009.

  1. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    By JOAN LOWY, Associated Press Writer Joan Lowy, Associated Press Writer – 57 mins ago

    FAA orders replacement of Airbus airspeed sensors - Yahoo! News

    WASHINGTON – U.S. officials on Thursday ordered the replacement of Airbus airspeed sensors of the type suspected of playing a role in the loss of Air France Flight 447 and all 228 people aboard in June.

    The Federal Aviation Administration said in a notice published in the Federal Register that U.S. airlines operating Airbus A330s and A340s must replace within 120 days at least two of three sensors made by European electronics giant Thales Corp. on each plane. The approved replacements are made by North Carolina-based Goodrich Corp.

    The order affects 43 U.S. registered planes — 32 operated by Northwest Airlines, now part of Delta Air Lines, and 11 operated by US Airways. All are A330s; there are no A340s registered in the U.S.

    FAA said the order was based on "numerous reports" that the sensors, called Pitot tubes, can become blocked at high altitudes in stormy weather. When that happens, it can lead to a loss of airspeed information or inaccurate information.

    Northwest and US Airways had already replaced their older Thales Pitot tubes with newer model tubes, but are now in the process of replacing those tubes with Goodrich tubes.

    While a car's speedometer uses tire rotation to calculate speed, an airplane uses Pitot tubes to measure changing air pressure. Computers interpret that information as speed. And while a car with a broken speedometer might be little more than an inconvenience, many airplane control systems rely on accurate speed information to work properly.

    In Airbus planes, which are highly automated, recent incidents indicate that no airspeed data or inaccurate data may sometimes trigger a series of events, including the shutdown of the autopilot and the automatic power system. It can also result in the plane's computers shifting to what is called "alternate law," where nearly complete control of the aircraft's systems are placed in the hands of the pilot for manual flight.

    A sudden reversion to alternate law is usually a last ditch effort to give a pilot a chance to save a troubled aircraft, aviation safety experts said.

    "Depending on the prevailing airplane altitude and weather, this condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced control of the airplane," FAA said in its notice.

    The European Aviation Safety Agency finalized a similar order on Aug. 31 to replace the Thales sensors with Goodrich sensors. FAA officials had been waiting for the European agency to act first since Airbus, a subsidiary of the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, is based in France.

    French investigators have focused on the possibility that Flight 447's sensors iced over and sent false speed information to the computers as the plane ran into a thunderstorm at about 35,000 feet. The A330 disappeared over the Atlantic on June 1 during a Rio de Janiero-to-Paris flight.

    An important part of the investigation focuses on 24 automatic messages the plane sent during its final minutes. They show the autopilot was not working, but it is unclear whether the pilots shut it off or whether it shut down because of the conflicting airspeed readings.

    Three weeks after the Air France crash, the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board announced it was investigating two other A330 flights that experienced a loss of airspeed data.

    In May, a plane belonging to Brazilian company TAM Airlines lost airspeed and altitude data while flying from Miami to Sao Paulo, Brazil. Autopilot and automatic power also shut down and the pilot took over, according to an NTSB report. The computer systems came back about five minutes later.

    On June 23, a Northwest flight hit rain and turbulence while on autopilot outside of Kagoshima, Japan. According to an NTSB report, speed data began to fluctuate. The plane alerted pilots it was going too fast. Autopilot and other systems began shutting down, putting nearly all the plane's control in the hands of the pilot, something that usually happens only in emergencies.

    NTSB investigators discovered at least a dozen previous instances of brief losses of airspeed information when they reviewed archived flight data for Northwest's A330 fleet, The Associated Press reported last month.

    All of the incidents took place in the Intertropical Convergence Zone, which extends from 5 degrees north of the equator to 5 degrees south, and is known for its frequent, intense thunderstorms. All the planes involved landed safely.
     
  2. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    This should have been done a long time ago. What I don't understand though is the talk of blocking pitot tubes. This is not an airbus problem but a problem with every pitot tube I have ever seen.

    For instance the Sikorsky pitot tubes on the Blackhawk clog up in bad weather or icing conditions (if the deicer on the pitot tube fails).

    I think they should be looking at pitot tubes on all aircraft, and I do not understand how this problem is only surfacing now.
     
  3. syscom3

    syscom3 Pacific Historian

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    12,631
    Likes Received:
    309
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Orange County, CA
    #3 syscom3, Sep 3, 2009
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2009
    Perhaps its a critical design issue with the avionics system of the A330 and A340, for when the pitot tubes get blocked under a certein circumstance?

    Other avionics systems might not malfunction to the same degree, thus while it isnt good to lose the pitot tube, the aircraft still flies.
     
  4. trackend

    trackend Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    4,039
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Occupation:
    Retired tech support railway engineer
    Location:
    Ipswich, Suffolk
    Intresting Chris I'm really suprised as it is such old techknowledgy I would have thought any defects in pitot tubes would havve be ironed out years ago.
     
  5. DerAdlerIstGelandet

    DerAdlerIstGelandet Der Crew Chief
    Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    41,768
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Occupation:
    A&P - Aircraft Technician
    Location:
    USA/Germany
    Agreed...

    The only thing I can see is what sys just pointed out, that it must interfere with the computers too much, because the pitot tube problem is nothing new.
     
  6. PJay

    PJay Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Occupation:
    logistics
    Location:
    London UK
    Of course Airbus/Air France are trying to say 'pilot error'. Bah!
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. ArturianDude001
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    62
  2. sunny91
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    803
  3. ellis995
    Replies:
    30
    Views:
    2,406
  4. comiso90
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,559
  5. syscom3
    Replies:
    70
    Views:
    7,709

Share This Page