33k in the air
Staff Sergeant
- 1,356
- Jan 31, 2021
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
To my knowledge, the M 262 appeared only in limited numbers and thus had a limited impact. More Me 262 = more impact BUT also more effort on the allied side to counter it. Assuming allied jet development to be too far behind, at least for the moment, what could, excellent, piston-enginged fighters do against it? Could the speed advantage for example have been negated by the pistoners flying high and diving after the Me 262? My understanding is that while it was fast, it wasn't very maneuverable.
Read about that, though I understand the Luftwaffe countered by piston-engined fighetrs covering the jets and by deploying a sh...eer-load ot AAA around the airfields.One of the countermeasures the Allies employed was to identify the airfields from which the Me 262 operated, and then have Allied fighters patrol near those airfields waiting for when the Me 262s came in to land to rearm and refuel, a time when the jets were very vulnerable as they were low and slow and unable to avoid an attack.
While definitely something easily done later in the war, I believe this would not have been feasible earlier, when the Luftwaffe still packed a punch?Another countermeasure is to blast every airfield operating the Me 262 with bombs — be they from heavy, medium, or fighter bombers — and repeat such attacks as often as necessary. The Allies had the advantage of overwhelming strength in the air, and thus the resources to spare to direct more bombing attacks against airfields.
Read about that, though I understand the Luftwaffe countered by piston-engined fighetrs covering the jets and by deploying a sh...eer-load ot AAA around the airfields.
While definitely something easily done later in the war, I believe this would not have been feasible earlier, when the Luftwaffe still packed a punch?
Historically, July 1944.I'm wondering about the timeline. Weren't the 262s operational in '44, not '43?
I was just joshing, but look here, GAS TURBINE JAGDTIGER - The Tiger Collection
I was just joshing, but look here, GAS TURBINE JAGDTIGER - The Tiger Collection
Well...What were they thinking putting jet engines into heavy tanks
Can you imagine the fuel consumption? If there's any German aero engine tech that could be applied to the Wehrmacht it's the Luftwaffe's two stroke, opposed-piston diesel engines, not jet turbines. What were they thinking putting jet engines into heavy tanks?
Gasoline (Petrol) is highly refined oil.Wasn't the fuel required by piston-engines then much more highly refined then what went into tank engines?
I had a similar chat with my bike club, guys swearing that synthetic oil is better than petroleum-based oils. Better it may be, but it's still petroleum based, only a different level of refinement. To my mind marketing names like "synthetic" oil is a lie.Gasoline (Petrol) is highly refined oil. Kerosene (#2 and Pearl) and Diesel (all grades) are a basic refinement of oil.
The Soviets didn't have much of a jet program, though they had been working with mixed power before Germany attacked them with the I-153DM.
Useful summary here:I was just joshing, but look here, GAS TURBINE JAGDTIGER - The Tiger Collection