Grumman XF5F, what if?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Actually while two V-1710's on a P-40 airframe are rather obviously absurd, this picture has sparked me to wonder what two engines might feasibly been mounted instead.

And I have not come up with any reasonable ideas. Two Ranger V-770 might have worked, if you could have gotten them to run long enough, but what would be the point? Two RR Peregrine engines like the Whirlwind would have been better but still not impressive.

You'd be better off just putting two P-40's together, P-82 style.
 
Is this photoshopped? And what's underneath the streamlined nacelles, the fuel tanks? What in the world?!!
Secondary comment: I found this picture on another thread where someone suggested having German POWs fly one back. Not a good idea. Look what happened when they got their hands on the U.S. 2.5 Bazooka.
 
Last edited:
It was actually built.
The serial number is from a P-40C, the engines were said to be Packard Merlins.

I have never read anywhere that it was flown, but it is real.
Was there any reason given for building it?
 
Not that I've ever read, but seeing as how it was cobbled together from parts: P-40C fuseage, P-40D or E canopy, newer cowlings with Merlins, it seems they had some spare time on their hands and plenty of parts on hand to do it.
Taking another look at it I get the impression that they were thinking along the same lines as the XF5F.
 
From the book illustrated above, the Author/s believe it is a hoax of some sort.
Not photo shopped but they say that several aircraft structural engineers say that the existing P-40 wing would not hold the weight or stress of a pair of Merlins installed like that.
It might have been part of a disinformation campaign?
There is no paper work trail in the Curtiss records apparently.
 
From Joe Baugher's site:

"P-40C
41-13456 modified in 1942 to become a mock-up of an undesignated twin-engined fighter. W/o 18 Feb 1943 at Craig Field, AL; Condemned Feb 27, 1943."
A mock-up makes more sense. They probably wanted to get a feel for using/modifying existing components to create a twin engine fighter as a possibility.
 

Users who are viewing this thread