Hardest plane to take down in WW2?

• Feb 10, 2006

• #161

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

This pun exchange has been blown way out of proportion

 

• Feb 10, 2006

• #162

FLYBOYJ

"THE GREAT GAZOO"

28,097

8,751

Apr 9, 2005

Colorado, USA

You're right, its time to pull the pin on this one....

 

• Feb 10, 2006

• #163

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

you know it's posts like that which shake the very foundations of our beliefs..........

 

• Mar 9, 2006

• #164

CurzonDax

Senior Airman

355

0

Sep 21, 2005

Geez that why I joined this list for all the explosive comentary.

:{)

 

• Mar 9, 2006

• #165

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

a little late but let's see what's left in the tank .........

ummm, wow, you just exploded onto the scene from nowhere

 

• Mar 9, 2006

• #166

FLYBOYJ

"THE GREAT GAZOO"

28,097

8,751

Apr 9, 2005

Colorado, USA

God, is this subject blowing up again?!?

 

• Mar 9, 2006

• #167

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

My God, my bowels feel like they are blowing up again...

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #168

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

two blowing up puns in a row, that's quite a shocking development

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #169

FLYBOYJ

"THE GREAT GAZOO"

28,097

8,751

Apr 9, 2005

Colorado, USA

Agree, this could have explsoive, earth-shattering results!!!

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #170

Gnomey

Globetrotting Surgeon General

Staff

Mod

71,240

9,033

Nov 28, 2004

London / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK

www.flickr.com

As long as it doesn't get blown out of proportion it should be alright...

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #171

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

if it did blow up i'd imagine it'd cause quite an impact.......

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #172

Gnomey

Globetrotting Surgeon General

Staff

Mod

71,240

9,033

Nov 28, 2004

London / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK

www.flickr.com

I'm sure it would, it might just blow us away...

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #173

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

or we'd jsut crumble into tiny bits as a result.........

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #174

Gnomey

Globetrotting Surgeon General

Staff

Mod

71,240

9,033

Nov 28, 2004

London / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK

www.flickr.com

Or we could be vapourised...

 

• Mar 10, 2006

• #175

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Boom!

Hehe, im funny. 8)

 

• May 8, 2007

• Thread starter
• #176

Hunter368

Tech Sergeant

2,145

17

Nov 5, 2005

Winnipeg

Which was able to absorb more battle damage? Spitfire or 109? Name your model of each, please keep to roughly same year as each other.

 

• May 15, 2007

• #177

b17sam

Airman

32

1

Mar 21, 2005

Gainesville, Florida

www.b17sam.com

This forum seems to agree that the B17 was the toughest bomber to shoot down. Perhaps it would be wise to remember that the 8th Air Force alone lost over 3500 B17s.

 

• May 15, 2007

• Thread starter
• #178

Hunter368

Tech Sergeant

2,145

17

Nov 5, 2005

Winnipeg

b17sam said:

Perhaps it would be wise to remember that the 8th Air Force alone lost over 3500 B17s.

Click to expand...

So they lost 3500 B17's whats your point?

 

• May 16, 2007

• #179

H

Haztoys

Senior Airman

428

2

Dec 1, 2005

Prescott Arizona USA

Gnomey said:

B-17 Battle Damage




More here: Battle-Damaged B-17 Flying Fortresses: Contents

Click to expand...

This would of been done with..?.Or by..??

...88 shell... Eric's...Post of "Up your ass and your dead manuver"...??

 

• May 16, 2007

• #180

comiso90

Senior Master Sergeant

3,583

23

Dec 19, 2006

FL

b17sam said:

This forum seems to agree that the B17 was the toughest bomber to shoot down. Perhaps it would be wise to remember that the 8th Air Force alone lost over 3500 B17s.

Click to expand...

That sir, is very flawed logic...

The Germans lost almost 6 million in military deaths so they were poor soldiers?