Hawker Tempest Mk.II & Bristol Centaurus Questions

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Zipper730

Chief Master Sergeant
4,430
1,023
Nov 9, 2015
The Tempest Mk.II seemed to have greater performance than the Tempest Mk.V with seemingly greater speeds across the board and increased climb-rates: What I could use is a graph which depicts
  • TAS vs Altitude with the power settings used
  • Rate of Climb vs Engine Power and Altitude.

While I'm aware of the very basic details of the Bristol Centaurus in that I know the Centaurus V was used in the aircraft, it had a two-speed supercharger, and that depending on fuel, it could run on +8 to +12 yielding horsepower figures of 2300-2650 in MS, and 1950 in FS with +8: What I could use is information regarding some clarity on engine performance
  • Did the RAF have sufficient resources of high-octane fuel to permit the use of +12 on a routine basis
  • Could +12 be used in FS gear?
 
Last edited:
While I'm aware of the very basic details of the Bristol Centaurus in that I know the Centaurus V was used in the aircraft, it had a two-speed supercharger, and that depending on fuel, it could run on boost levels of +8" to +12" yielding horsepower figures of 2300-2650 in MS, and 1950 in FS with +8": What I could use is information regarding some clarity on engine performance
  • Did the RAF have sufficient resources of high-octane fuel to permit the use of +12" on a routine basis
  • Could +12" be used in FS gear?
[/QUOTE]

I expect you actually mean +8 or +12 psi (pounds), not inches. 8 = 46.2 inches, 12 = 54.4 inches. :)
 
The Tempest Mk.II seemed to have greater performance than the Tempest Mk.V with seemingly greater speeds across the board and increased climb-rates: What I could use is a graph which depicts
  • TAS vs Altitude with the power settings used
  • Rate of Climb vs Engine Power and Altitude.

While I'm aware of the very basic details of the Bristol Centaurus in that I know the Centaurus V was used in the aircraft, it had a two-speed supercharger, and that depending on fuel, it could run on +8 to +12 yielding horsepower figures of 2300-2650 in MS, and 1950 in FS with +8: What I could use is information regarding some clarity on engine performance
  • Did the RAF have sufficient resources of high-octane fuel to permit the use of +12 on a routine basis
  • Could +12 be used in FS gear?


did you look at WWII Aircraft Performance?
 
Bristol Centaurus power chart March 1945.
Public Record Office Kew. AVIA 15/2911.

Neil.

IMG_0823.JPG
 
I'm looking in a document on the Sea Fury Mk.11 and max continuous is 6-1/2", maximum listed is 9-1/2". Did the RN:FAA have access to different octane fuel levels, or was this a peacetime setting?

What was the wartime normal power rating in pressure and horsepower?
 
Intended http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/Fury/Sea_Fury_Flight.pdf and would of required 150 grade fuel. The Aeroplane magazine of 1946 gives 2,780hp at 3,000ft with this performance. No it doesn't give power in F.S.
Lots of power
No need to thrash the engine given the lack of opposition. Many aircraft post war ran lower boost than was possible.
But the normal setting was still +6.5 or higher?
 
Is there anyway to correlate PSI or Inches HG to horsepower?
Only for one engine, and only for one supercharger gear and only for one altitude and only for one airspeed and only for........
merlin66hpchart.jpg


Please note the constant rpm and constant airspeed. Below the peaks (to the left) the pressure is constant yet power varies until throttle is fully opened.
Difference between high and low gear is the power needed to run the supercharger and the fact that the air is less dense due to the higher temperature even if the pressure is the same.
 
Centaurus V,VI,VIII,IX,X & XI

Boost.....Fuel..........Horsepower (No Ram)
...............................M/S..................................F/S..............................Notes
+8-1/2....100/130....2520 bhp @ 1000'...........2225 bhp @ 11000'....
+10........100/130....2700 bhp @ 0' (+9-1/2)...,,2450 bhp @ 9250'......Water Injection
+12........100/150....2570 bhp @ 0' (+9-1/2).....2500 bhp @ 6500'......
+16........100/150....2700 bhp @ 0' (+9-1/2).....2880 bhp @ 1750'......Water Injection

Boost.....Fuel..........Horsepower (Ram)..............................................Notes
...............................M/S...................................F/S
+8-1/2....100/130....2500 bhp @ 5250'............2200 bhp @ 15250'
+10........100/130....2755 bhp @ 2750'............2415 bhp @ 13000'....Water Injection
+12........100/150....2730 bhp @ 0'..................2475 bhp @ 11750'
+16........100/150....2950 bhp @ 0' (+12-1/2)....2850 bhp @ 6000'......Water Injection

If the + 6.5" figure is the same on the wartime settings that would yield 2160 and 2100 in MS/FS gear...
 
I an having a very difficult time finding what M and S designation for the SC gear/ratios stand for...can anyone help me? Nvm, got it. Moderate and High/Supercharged
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back