The Tempest Mk.II seemed to have greater performance than the Tempest Mk.V with seemingly greater speeds across the board and increased climb-rates: What I could use is a graph which depicts
While I'm aware of the very basic details of the Bristol Centaurus in that I know the Centaurus V was used in the aircraft, it had a two-speed supercharger, and that depending on fuel, it could run on +8 to +12 yielding horsepower figures of 2300-2650 in MS, and 1950 in FS with +8: What I could use is information regarding some clarity on engine performance
- TAS vs Altitude with the power settings used
- Rate of Climb vs Engine Power and Altitude.
While I'm aware of the very basic details of the Bristol Centaurus in that I know the Centaurus V was used in the aircraft, it had a two-speed supercharger, and that depending on fuel, it could run on +8 to +12 yielding horsepower figures of 2300-2650 in MS, and 1950 in FS with +8: What I could use is information regarding some clarity on engine performance
- Did the RAF have sufficient resources of high-octane fuel to permit the use of +12 on a routine basis
- Could +12 be used in FS gear?
Last edited: