P61 questions (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

olbrat

Airman
67
0
Mar 19, 2008
I was curious about the handling characteristics of the P61. I know it was used effectively as a night fighting aircraft. I also enjoyed assembling the model. It has an interesting design.

Was it designed to be used against specific aircraft (other than whatever was in it's way)?

Was it easy/enjoyable to fly?

Did it ever have to "dogfight"?

Was it ever used in daylight? If so, in what capacity?

I'm sorry if this is "old hash", but I'm still a newbie here.

Thanks.
 
I'll tell you what I know (from a book I have about the plane).

The design was based watching the use of British nightfighters and incorporating their radar (which was later copied and improved upon by MIT). It was the only night fighter used by any force in WWII that was designed as such from the beginning.

For a large plane, it was maneuverable because of the use of spoilers. I haven't read about any dogfights per se, it usually crept upon its victim and either got them or the prey slipped away.

It wasn't a fast plane (360 mph; except for the P61C at 420 mph which didn't see service in time) so it would be somewhat vulnerable in daylight. A P-61 was able to shoot down two FW190s in the dawn hours but that is one of the few kills made during daylight. A P-61 was used in the Philippines in "The Great Raid" when US forces liberated a Japanese POW camp. The plane made low flight maneuvers over the camp to distract attention away from the camp guards.
 
Hi,

And here my three cents to that.After D-day 422NFS at the end of July 1944 was at Maupertus airfield near Cherburg and was attached to 9th Air Force but 435NFS in August.In the same month both squadrons were involved in daily misins against ground targets in France ( operation Intruder) During one of flights crews of 425NFS destroyed four German aircraft.In October 1944 both squadrons were continued their daily assault missions mostly.
 
Hi Olbrat,

>Was it designed to be used against specific aircraft (other than whatever was in it's way)?

It was designed as a night fighter. It was a bit special in having a flexible top turret - this indicates a special doctrine of use that apparently did not have any actual operational application later.

Though it's often considered "the first purpose-built night fighter", it's worth noting that for all practical purposes, the Heinkel He 219 was a purpose-built night fighter too, though due to the multi-purpose doctrine of the Luftwaffe, other roles were considered (but never implemented). Originally, the He 219 designation had been used for a high-speed reconnaissance aircraft with a contra-rotating central propeller like the He 119, but the later He 219 night fighter actually has nothing in common with that design study except the designation.

>Was it easy/enjoyable to fly?

An important advantage of the Northrop P-61 over other contemporary designs was its very low single-engine safety speed. The rudders appear to have been exceptionally effective, allowing the pilot to use full power on one engine if the other one failed even at low speeds without loss of control. In combat operations at night where you might come home with battle damage, the ability to go around on one engine when something goes wrong on landing is a definite plus!

You can find a historic P-61 manual in this thread:

http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/other-mechanical-systems-tech/p-61-pilots-manual-6789.html

(The first publicized image of the then-secret P-61 was a drawing in one of Milton Caniff's comic strips, by the way. He had seen the prototype in flight, failing to appreciate that despite being flown in broad daylight over a major city, it was still supposed to be secret - reportedly, he got into a bit of trouble with the authorities for that strip!)

Have fun! :)

Henning (HoHun)
 
Thanks for the info guys! It helps fill in a few (mental) blanks for me.

I love the idea of the secret prototype being in one of Milton Caniff's strips! I can just picture the Dragon Lady holding Terry hostage until Pat Ryan gives her the secret plans. Ha Ha
 
The U.S.Navy also used some for advaced training.They look kinda neat all black with white USN lettering.
Ed
 
yes one of the ETO P-61's got into a dogfight with the tail gunner of a He 177 and lost, the P-61 was ripped pretty well and crash landed and then used for parts
 
The design was based watching the use of British nightfighters and incorporating their radar (which was later copied and improved upon by MIT). It was the only night fighter used by any force in WWII that was designed as such from the beginning.
US radar developments in WWII were helped by access to general British data, but the main radar used in the P-61, SCR-720, was not a copy of a British set. In fact some later Brit nightfighters also used SCR-720. The earlier SCR-540 was a copy of a British set, but not too successful and not used much in nightfighters.

On visual dogfights, the 421st NFS had several with Japanese day fighters around dawn and dusk when defending the new airfield at Tacloban on Leyte in late 1944. For example a flight of P-61's jumped a pair of Tony's at dawn Nov 10 '44 claiming both. Another example, on evening patrol Nov 28 '44 a flight was credited with 4 victories, over Zekes and Hamps, 1 with by fwd firing 20mm and three with .50 cal turret guns. I don't know the actual Japanese opponents and results.

Joe
 
THERE ARE NOT P61 LOST TO FIGHTER OF GERMEN? AND HOW MANY P61 LOST IN EUROPE?
 
Hey olbrat,there's a good book out titled "Queen of the Midnight Skies" it is the full history of not only the P-61 btu most of the night fighters in WW2,one of the authors is Gary Pape,I don't recall other one,you need this book it will give you a very good look into what you're wanting.
Johnny Signor [email protected]
 
Screen Shot 2020-12-30 at 10.21.59 PM.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back