I would guess it wouldn't be too difficult to modify CR.32 or CR.42 for carrier operations, as biplanes they had short takeoff runs. Less sure about MC 200 or Fiat G.50. The Re 2000 (2001) series was the aircraft line selected for the fighter job, right? I know they came up with a torpedo carrying G.55 which seems like it would have been a beast of a carrier plane but it came far too late.
I believe they also made a torpedo carrying version of the Re 2001. This seems to be the only provision for an Italian single engined strike aircraft I can think of, though in a way it's not necessarily a mistake not to have a specialized dive bomber or torpedo bomber, as fighter bombers were gradually taking over the strike role for naval aircraft during the war. Wiki says they built 50 of the OR Serie II specifically intended for the Aquila. I can't say it seems like a bad Naval plane by the standards of the day. In theory based on speed, range, armament, it should have been better than a Fulmar, a Skua, a Vindicator, a Vultee Vengeance, a Buffalo, or (arguably) a Swordfish or an Albacore, especially given the notorious efficacy of Italian torpedoes. Debatable but maybe in the ball park of a F4F, TBD, or SBD in at least some respects.
Probably a more effective torpedo bomber than anything the USN had available (in part due to the bad American torpedoes), and I think the Re 2001 could hold its own against Hurricanes and Kittyhawks. They (land based versions) even seem to have held their own moderately well against Spitfire MK Vs over Malta.
I believe they also made a torpedo carrying version of the Re 2001. This seems to be the only provision for an Italian single engined strike aircraft I can think of, though in a way it's not necessarily a mistake not to have a specialized dive bomber or torpedo bomber, as fighter bombers were gradually taking over the strike role for naval aircraft during the war. Wiki says they built 50 of the OR Serie II specifically intended for the Aquila. I can't say it seems like a bad Naval plane by the standards of the day. In theory based on speed, range, armament, it should have been better than a Fulmar, a Skua, a Vindicator, a Vultee Vengeance, a Buffalo, or (arguably) a Swordfish or an Albacore, especially given the notorious efficacy of Italian torpedoes. Debatable but maybe in the ball park of a F4F, TBD, or SBD in at least some respects.
Probably a more effective torpedo bomber than anything the USN had available (in part due to the bad American torpedoes), and I think the Re 2001 could hold its own against Hurricanes and Kittyhawks. They (land based versions) even seem to have held their own moderately well against Spitfire MK Vs over Malta.