Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Unless you have absolute dictatorial powers a lot of this is not going to happen. Yes, Bristol made a mistake in trying to offer different 4 engines from 24.9 to 28.7 liters. But in hindsight it was the Taurus that was the Mistake. Since a Mercury is pretty much a Pegasus with 1 inch less stroke and a good part of the tooling existed before 1936 you don't save much by knocking of the Mercury. Perseus used Hercules cylinders, sleeves, pistons, at least to start. Only other program they were really fooling with was the Centaurus and telling Bristol before the war broke out that they would be kept in 2nd or 3rd place (no 2000 hp engine) among British engine makers wasn't going to happen.
The A-S Tiger didn't need just new bearings, it needed a new crankshaft and new crankcase to hold the bearings. From some stories J. Siddeley could be a pretty hard headed fellow.
<snip>
Why were they [UK and France] paying the US and US companies rather than keeping the money inside the commonwealth?
And lets think about this. IF the Canadians had been capable of build a large Merlin Factory in 1939/40 WHY did the British approach the US and try to get Ford at first and then Packard to build the Merlin?
WHY did the British (in 1939) pay Pratt Whitney enough money to double the floor space of their factory to meet British orders ( after the French had already paid to double the size of the original factory).
No dictatorial powers, just buyer's powers
In other words, A-S should churn out the Tigers and Cheetahs for aircraft that are away from limelight, like transports, trainers, Coastal Command needs, and Whitley until something better is available?
However, the Australians managed to license build the Twin Wasps Jr and Twin Wasp, later the Merlins. The CAC was established in 1936.
The 1939/40 is way too late to commence with Merlin project in Canada or Australia. The negotiations have to start in 1936, with factory being built in 1937, or latest in 1938.
Same thing: when things got ugly, only the big US companies have had capacity to turn the money other resources into workable engines quickly enough. Commonwealth needs an earlier start.
To move a bit from engines: how should the needs for a land-based torpedo bomber be addressed?
In 1935-36-37 the engine companies were still looking at/for foreign and commercial sales. The Government could not forbid a company from working on an engine, at least to prototype status. They did their best to discourage Fairey.
The Tiger faded from sight pretty quick in the late 30s, with some justification. A-S should, as historically, churn out the Cheetah.
Established in 1936. Got license for and started production of NOT the Twin Wasp Jr. but the 9 cylinder Wasp R-1340. and that was closer to 1938. Production of the R-1830 followed several years later with the Merlin several years after that.
It takes time to build up from almost scratch." the first CA-1 Wirraway, RAAF serial A20-3, made its maiden flight on 27 March 1939" and the 6th was delivered by the beginning of Sept. 1939.
The Commonwealth had to start even earlier. and then you are back to the problem of which engine/aircraft you tool up for. The Commonwealth projects also need machine tools and equipment that they cannot manufacture themselves without adding even more delays so the machine tools and equipment have to come from either the UK (delaying the shadow factory program there) or the US.
Simple way. Ditch both the Botha and the Beaufort (except for enough Beauforts to work out construction, 2-4?) and use Whitleys until you can hang a Torpedo under the Beaufighter.
Simple way. Ditch both the Botha and the Beaufort (except for enough Beauforts to work out construction, 2-4?) and use Whitleys until you can hang a Torpedo under the Beaufighter.
The companies can, by all means, sell the engines abroad. It's the RAF's engines where we will be calling the shots
Fairey should be promised a good deal of airframe production, provided they sell their engine division to RR, Napier or Bristol?
...
Doesn't quite work that way. British are short of "engineers" which covers not only designers but office staff down to draftsmen. The only way to really speed up some programs is move some "engineers" from one program to another but if you don't have the authority to actually shut down a private company program (which they are trying to sell to another country or for airline use) then you don't have any way to shift any real number of "engineers".
The Fairey engine "division" was never more than a small experimental shop. The "first" Fairey engine was the Felix of of 1926 which was actually 50 imported Curtiss D.12 engines.
This was followed in the early 30s by the V-12 Prince and Super Prince of 25.54 liters, 3 engines had accumulated 550 hours by the end of 1934. One engine was installed in an airframe.
This was followed (or perhaps in parallel ) by the H-16 Prince an H-24 Monarch using the same size cylinders as Prince for 34 and 51 liters total number of these engines doesn't seem to be known but seems to very small. 2-3 Battles are used as test beds and while the first Monarch drawings are dated 29 Aug 1932 the engine doesn't pass a a 50 hour type test until until May/June of 1939 (with first aircraft installation predating that in Oct 1938.) The program creeps along until 1943.
Fairey probably built under a dozen engines in 8-10 years and there is no way to tell how much was contracted out (like block castings) and how much may have been done in house.
Let's not underestimate the Beaufort; it was a good aeroplane. The Botha wasn't, but it was the insurance policy, so easy to ditch. The Beaufighter is the obvious choice and if I had a choice between the Hampden and Beaufort, I'd choose the latter. If we are getting rid of the Taurus, the answer is simple; the Beaufort II and all the Aussie Beauforts were powered by American engines.
A bit too optimistic in timing, The Beaufort was ordered, like a number of other British of the time, "off the drawing board" in 1936 but the first "production" Plane "L4441" (actually first prototype) didn't fly until Oct 1938 while the rest of the planes on the "production"line waited for flight tests to be completed and see what modifications might or might not be needed. L4441 was finally delivered to No 22 Squadron in Nov 1939 upon completion of testing for initial familiarization of pilots while they waited 2 months for first true production aircraft. First operational flights were in May of 1940 and the problems with the Taurus really began to show up. British fly their first twin wasp powered plan in Aug of 1941 ( work started when?) Australians fly their first Australian-assembled Beaufort A9-1 on 5 May 1941 with the first Australian-built aircraft A9-7 coming off the production line in August.
R-2600 production in 1939 was 163 engines, 140 of them in the last 4 months (Sept being the first month to exceed 8 engines in one month).
Beaufighter was tested with R-2600 engines, in second half of ww2, though.
Unless there is an early effort to license produce them in Australia or elsewhere, the historic US demand will make them as good as unavailable for the Aussies/CW. Every A-20 needed 2, so did the B-25. Avenger is an important 'costumer', too.
So I wonder how much it might have been if the 'twin-wasp' option was accepted in 1938 !?
Not much change except the planes produced in in England in 1940 and early 1941 would have had better engines. But not enough better to change the Performance by much.