RAF Fighter Pilots Wounded/Injured Compared to US Pilots

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

The 8th Air Force records 3 separate deployments of its B-24 groups to the Mediterranean.

Torch Project, 13 December 1942 to 20 February 1943 by the 93rd Bomb Group, 23 days of operations, 237 sorties, 224 effective, 530.2 tons of bombs on target, 4 aircraft MIA. (93rd to North Africa on 7 December 1942, less 329th squadron, returned 25 February 1943)

Husky, Ploesti, Post Husky, 2 July to 21 August 1943, by the 44th, 93rd and 389th Bomb Groups, 20 days of operations, 989 sorties, 892 effective, 2,428.2 tons of bombs on target, 54 aircraft MIA, personnel, 28 KIA, 88 Wounded, 420 MIA, (depart: 44th on 27 June, 93rd on 26 June, 389th on 2 July, the 389th flew its first combat mission on 9 July, return 44th on 25 August, on 93rd 24 August, 389th on 25 August) As of 25 June the USAAF reports the 44th had 43 B-24, the 93rd 49 B-24 while the 389th was non operational.

5th Army Support, 21 September to 1 October 1943, by the 44th, 93rd and 389th Bomb Groups, 4 days of operations, 191 sorties, 172 effective, 406.6 tons of bombs on target, 11 aircraft MIA, personnel 4 wounded, 89 MIA. (depart: 44th on 19 September, 93rd on 17 September, 389th on 19 September, return 44th on 4 October, 93rd on 2 October, 389th on 3 October). Despite the title it included a raid on Austria on 1 October.

There was a B-24 mission in the ETO on 29 May 1943, next mission 7 September, then 9 and 15 September. The 392nd Group, first mission on 9 September, was left in Britain during the second 1943 deployment, flew diversions on 23, 26 and 27 September then a mission on 2 October, another diversion on 4 October, then 3 B-24 groups to Vegesack on 8 October (55/43 sorties), then all 4 groups sent to Danzig/Gdynia on 9 October (51/41 sorties), the B-24s flew further diversions on 10 and 14 October, before the next bombing mission on 3 November.

According to the figures supplied to the RAF, 8th AF B-24 on hand/serviceable in 1943 (weekly report), 17 August 21/9, 24 August 41/4, 31 August 103/16, 7 September 117/66, 10 September 105/80, 17 September 50/40, 24 September 74/50, 1 October 82/64, 8 October 149/112, 15 October 136/97, but figures may include overseas deployments. No B-24 groups operational in Europe on 17 August, then to 4 operational on 7 September, to 1 group 24 September, back to 4 groups on 8 October.

According to the USAAF as of 20 August 1943 the 44th in Britain had none, the 93rd 7, the 389th none and the 392nd 3 B-24 in the units, similar figures on 27 August, on 3 September it was up to 68 aircraft in the 4 groups.

The 389th group did fly the Ploesti mission. Roger Freeman lists the 14 October 1943 diversion as 15 from the 93rd and 14 from the 389th.
 
I'm also not cherry picking as the policies regarding pilot protection changed dramatically especially after the Battle of France, as for late in the war when you have less than 100 defending fighters against swarms of escort fighters I'm pretty sure most of the later wouldn't see an attacking fighter let alone engage in combat further diluting the results.

You start this point by typing "I'm not cherry-picking", and then proceed to do exactly that. Here, I'll help you out:

Cherry picking, suppressing evidence, or the fallacy of incomplete evidence is the act of pointing to individual cases or data that seem to confirm a particular position while ignoring a significant portion of related and similar cases or data that may contradict that position. Cherry picking may be committed intentionally or unintentionally.[2]

 
You start this point by typing "I'm not cherry-picking", and then proceed to do exactly that. Here, I'll help
Perhaps a bit of:

giphy.gif



Bit over spending words.
 
Without having any data at hand, it seems to me that I have read of a great many more cases of RAF fighter pilots being wounded or injured in combat than I have read of US fighter pilots being wounded or injured in combat. By this I mean injuries that occurred in combat in flight and not injuries sustained as a result of the ground rising up to smite the aircraft.

About the only case of a US pilot being wounded in air combat that I can think of is when Robert S. Johnson ran that FW-190 out of ammo and still made it home.

Does this reflect US fighter aircraft being tougher than RAF fighter aircraft? Certainly the P-40, P-38, P-47, F4F. F4U, F6F and even the P-39 seemed to have greater reputation for toughness than the Hurricane or Spitfire. Or does it reflect that US pilots were more likely to be much further from home and thus less able to sustain wounds and still make it back?
Hi

Returning to the original question and continuing on from my previous post of data from 'RAF Fighter Command War Diaries' by John Foreman, here follows the remaining months of the war from July 1943 to May 1945 (This is the period when USAAF fighters become more heavily involved in the fighting, the details include USAAF casualties with the known wounded totals at the time so they can be compared with the RAF known wounded. These are not post war research but what was known at the time):
Image_20240725_0001.jpg

Image_20240725_0002.jpg

Image_20240725_0003.jpg

Image_20240725_0004.jpg

MIke
 
Hi

Returning to the original question and continuing on from my previous post of data from 'RAF Fighter Command War Diaries' by John Foreman, here follows the remaining months of the war from July 1943 to May 1945 (This is the period when USAAF fighters become more heavily involved in the fighting, the details include USAAF casualties with the known wounded totals at the time so they can be compared with the RAF known wounded. These are not post war research but what was known at the time):
View attachment 790484
View attachment 790485
View attachment 790486
View attachment 790487
MIke

This is great stuff, Mike. Thanks for sharing.

If my maths is correct, RAF Fighter Command lost 3014 missing and killed compared to 3649 USAAF missing/killed during this period. However, the earlier period (in Mike's post #50) adds 1968 RAF KIA/MIA and 27 for the USAAF. That gives overall totals of 4962 for the RAF and 3676 for the USAAF. The RAF figures include some Mossies from 100 Gp which may bolster those numbers slightly but only by 151 MIA/KIA.

Fighter Command suffered a LOT of losses given that "there was not a hell of a lot for them to do" (sarcasm intentional).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back